To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: gmltc teaser
 Results 2681 – 2700 of 3230.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Legomodules
 
(...) Try: (URL) (for just the one pic) or (URL) (for a small page with a few others) ++Lar (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Lego Modular tables
 
(...) "How to Win Friends", by Larry P... <g, d & R!> JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Building my train table
 
(...) For a schematic of the current iteration of the GMLTC layout, check out: (URL) The dimensions of the rectangles are 30" x 45" (6 large gray baseplates) -John (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
OK, I think we're letting ourselves be worked up more than we should. I know it's true for me, I just had a rather heated offline exchange with John G, which is rather odd, he doesn't usually get excited, I must really be getting under his collar. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Legomodular standards
 
Watch this space. A conference call (sponsored by Mercator Software Inc.) was just held among GMLTC and BAYLTC and I believe we've reached a consensus on legomodular standards, for module size, and for the interface points. I don't want to (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
(...) Ropes? Huh?? ;-) The GMLTC lets kids get right up to our layout. Touching is discouraged, but it still happens. Yes, we get the occasional *crash*, but we can always rebuild. We had a great one this weekend, kid got his fingers in front of my (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Legomodules
 
(...) Larry has a picture on his site: (URL) is the GMLTC layout at 12 sections, we've since added 4 more. Each section is 45 inches (three grey baseplates) across the front, and 30 to 40 inches deep. Track height is 20 bricks + 1 plate above the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: First Meeting in the St. Louis Area.
 
(...) Quick 'FYI': The 2001 National Model Railroaders Association show is going to be held in St. Louis. Since you posted to .trains and .trains.org, this might be something to think about: (URL) fun! JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.us.il)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
In lugnet.trains, Daniel Siskind writes: I draw on my 30 years of MR experience in my reply to Dan... (...) GMLTC (...) No it isn't and I will refute your reasons point by point. (...) I've been advocating larger clearances for some time now. Other (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Proposed 'Legomodule' standard
 
(...) I agree completely. That's why we try to do that exact thing on our 'common' sections - the sections that *always* line up next to each other. Building vertical is good - it adds a lot of interest and visual appeal... JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Legomodules
 
Larry & JohnG, Thanks for pointing out these pictures. I think these pictures will help those of us who have not seen these wonderful displays at a train show. Those GMLTC pictures are stunning... Now I understand the need for standards beyond (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Lego Modular tables
 
(...) Something that came up on the call is that for geometry reasons, if you want curved modules not to have overhanging track you need your track centers on multiples of 8 studs away from the module edge. So the outermost track should be at 8 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Proposed 'Legomodule' standard
 
(...) I'm not even certain. I think the banquet table legs are around 30 inches, 1/2 inch plywood, 20 bricks = track height around 36 or 38 inches... (I might be way off though...) JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Black large Technic gear?
 
(...) The Technic turntable is available in black, I think from the big Space Shuttle set. I'm 99.9% sure that's what's in the picture. JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.technic)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
Well, this is turning-out to be a long thread so I think I'll add my 2 cents. I'm a big supporter of modular standards. But practically speaking, it isn't likely that Conan's GMLTC modules are going to be run with many other-standard modules in the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: Proposed 'Legomodule' standard
 
I was under the impression that you were using 3/4" plywood, which is what I was told before. I am using 3/4" plywood on top of the banquet legs. I will check the height this evening and post it. FYI, 20 bricks + 1 plate + 1 baseplate = 7.748", so (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
"Dean Husby" <nntp@akasa.bc.ca> wrote in message news:38D99A3F.9ED3C5...a.bc.ca... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) leaning (...) maximum (...) several reasons. 1) We didn't see any reason to re-invent the wheel - I am personally not a big NIH fan. 2) We (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Lego Modular tables
 
Why not do this in the mannor of N-track? Lenghts in multiples of 2 sections of track. Width: any width Ends: Track centers to be located at: 10 studs in, 20 studs in, (30 studs optional) from front of table. Hight: To be 36" or 40" high. Now, some (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
(...) I was trying to get people to calm down from throwing out ideas like "well, just buy a new trailer" or "just rent a Ryder, never mind that you use the trailer for storage between shows", which are not particularly helpful suggestions. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
(...) Again: Trailer is 76 inches wide. Trailer door is 72 inches wide. Between the wheelwells trailer is around 74 inches wide. We need to be able to get the racks into the trailer, and rotate them so they fit in 'cross ways'. This also gives us a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
 

gmltc
(score: 0.227)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR