To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: dead legends Beneke
 Results 5801 – 5820 of 6562.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) No, I'm feeling too uncomfortable to post... Afraid to be bashed all over Lugnet again... And that is no good. Not at all. Saskia (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: speaking of dead in the water...
 
(...) Correct! And as for quotes, because I am having a birthday (not my fiftieth!!) Joe says to Norman: "There's nothing tragic about being fifty. Not unless you're trying to be twenty-five" Angela (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Sure it is. And so is "bastard" and "moron" - but these terms have been deemed offensive, and so using them, even if accurate to do so, is considered offensive and rude. I should also point that 'sodomite' is not actually accurate, because it (...) (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) There is a technically accurate term for describing a male heterosexual who has kids--a term that isn't used in 'polite company' (though appears in many rap songs and movies that love to use profanity...)--I don't think Lee would like people (...) (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
Isn't a Sodomite someone from the ex-town (city?) of Sodom? Near Gomorrah? ;) Tim (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Virgin Galactic (was Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
 
(...) Well you could try his webpage: (URL) I didn't read as much naysayer out of that as you did. It seems to me like a realistic assessment of the situation. However I suspect the writing context of the article is sloppy. I'm pretty sure some of (...) (20 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) First of all, let me say thank you to Lenny for his (URL) input>. He is quite correct that it is falacious to caricature the position of one's opponent and then attack that position as if it were the real one. That's the classic (URL) Straw (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) I thought (URL) was the friend to children everywhere. Dave! (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: speaking of dead in the water...
 
(...) Spoiler It's the bricks that got small. Sunset Boulevard? George (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Agreed. It is also inaccurate in that (at least in my view, which may be flawed because I'm hetero) having a preference and acting on that preference are not at all the same thing. (and the distinction goes a lot deeper than that) However I (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) That's true, if viewed in a certain light. Murder is always wrong, but societies define "murder" according to their own sense of morality. Many people would consider executing criminals to be murder. Texans do not. Many people would consider (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) He is. But he used to summer in a suburb of Sodom, where all the parents used to enlist his aid as a babysitter whenever they needed to have some alone time. (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) I don't assume anything about Dave - his own statements show he is a moral relativist. Nobody else here apparently has problems calling things as they see them when it goes against their own positions. I'm no different. And I am just about (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) SNIPPED in order to meet post req's (...) SNIP for post req (...) Dave, this discussion is a total joke. You rip me for assuming you're a moral relativist because you don't come out and say you are, and then proceed to use every type of moral (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) I did not rip you. I cautioned you against the use of a Straw Man falacy in misapplying the definition of tolerance, but that's a discussion of rhetoric. If you perceived my addressing of your rhetorical shortcomings as a "rip" on you (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) What is a religion, if not a "belief system"? Just because atheism is not an organized religion doesn't mean it's not a religion at all. (...) You must have missed my lengthy discussion with Mr. Schuler regarding the fundamental differences (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Shouldn't that be "declaimed", and not "disclaimed"? On no! Your entire argument now has now been forfeited! Nyahh. Nyahh, nyahh, nyahh. ;-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is religion dead in the water?
 
(...) It is entirely dependent on approach. I've seen atheists who approach it as a religion, and others that do not. Generally, the more strident and absolutist an atheist is, the more it approaches a religion. The more dispassionate and scientific (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Dictionary.com gives a serviceable definition of (URL) religion,> a definition with which I find myself in general agreement. In casual parlance I would pare it down a little further to say that religion entails the worship of and/or positive (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) I guess my posts could sometimes be declammed when I've cited too many shellfish. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

dead
(score: 0.964)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR