To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26139
26138  |  26140
Subject: 
Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:40:33 GMT
Viewed: 
1168 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
  
   I believe ‘sodomite’ is an accurate term, and the way I used it was not to bash anyone.

Sure it is. And so is “bastard” and “moron” - but these terms have been deemed offensive, and so using them, even if accurate to do so, is considered offensive and rude.

I should also point that ‘sodomite’ is not actually accurate, because it describes only one particular action, which may or may not have anything to do with homosexuality. ‘Sodomite’ is about a certain type of sex, ‘Homosexual’ is about what sort of person you *love* in relation to you. Homosexual only refers to the love/attraction felt, and not the actions you take to express those feelings.

   You neglected to show the context in which I used that word in the first place, which was to show that by the term ‘sodomite’ one would know both ‘sexual orientation’ and also know what kinds of sex acts one might expect would occur. It has nothing to do with imagination. Here is the two paragraphs that show the context:

Context is irrelevant. If I (being a white, middle class male) used the n-word for whatever reason, whatever context, whatever purpose - if I merely used the word, it is offensive and I should refrain from doing so. ‘Sodomite’ has a similiar power - and again, despite accuracy or any other quality of the word: a piece of advice - avoid using it. And never use it directed against someone personally.

-Lenny

There is a technically accurate term for describing a male heterosexual who has kids--a term that isn’t used in ‘polite company’ (though appears in many rap songs and movies that love to use profanity...)--I don’t think Lee would like people calling him that...

And, as far as I’m concerned, heterosexual or a homosexual does not imply the range of ‘sex acts’ that can take place--it’s just a description of who you’re attracted to--when I was a teenager, I knew I was a heterosexual because I was attracted to women, and no ‘coupling’ took place thru my those years. But that’s just me.

Lenny stated things perfectly.

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Sure it is. And so is "bastard" and "moron" - but these terms have been deemed offensive, and so using them, even if accurate to do so, is considered offensive and rude. I should also point that 'sodomite' is not actually accurate, because it (...) (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR