LUGNET News : Search Results: dead legends Beneke


Search Results: dead legends Beneke

Results 4101 – 4120 of 6562.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
(...) (URL) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
"Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0F3x6.BLy@lugnet.com... (...) Remember (...) The service catalogue was still active until relatively recently in the UK, certainly I ordered bits from it after the release of the 8448. I (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Building Philosophy: Bricks vs. Beams (was Re: Technic's Dead)
(...) I completely agree that bricks have there own place and can be very useful, but I do believe the style of rounded beams and liftarms are a better means for technical modeling then the Technic brick. I still use bricks in all of my models, but (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
(...) It would be AWESOME if LEGO were to sponsor such a building challenge themed TV show. One of the most-asked questions at our train shows is 'are these all kits? where can I buy them?' They are floored when we tell them we build it ourselves, (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		RE: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
(...) I'd take it one step further - Brickyard Wars. I hate the Junkyard Wars show becasue the junkyard is so obviously seeded with the parts required to execute one of the three designs for the project. But that doesn't keep me from flipping to the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
"Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0DzB7.83t@lugnet.com... (...) You mean you never crash tested your 8860 to destruction as a child? That front bumper was surprisingly tough! Jennifer (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Building Philosophy: Bricks vs. Beams (was Re: Technic's Dead)
(...) Technically, not quite: a beam is 7.8mm in pinhole direction (same as a brick), 7.4mm between smooth faces Philo (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
(...) While it might have been fun for US (as AFOL's), for the target market (8-16 y/o) it would have made things worse. Kids can't spend $200-300 per set. Also most shops can't / won't stock such expensive sets. Perhaps in the USA it would have (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic is Alive !!!! ( I got tired of that other headline)
Ok, I'm so pumped up right now about Technic more than ever! And I got tired of that Technic's "dead" headline. Without reading the entire thread, my spartan reply is this! I love Technic! e (Besides, I'm building with Technic right now and I'm (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
(...) Surely not. Think back to what the store shelves looked like. There is a reason that Technic has died. (...) What kids need is the experience of complex modularity with rules of certain varying granularity. Technic (and LEGO more generally) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
(...) I'm just jumping in to this thread now, sorry if I'm redundant.. (...) nope, no way. (IMHO) (...) What about DACTA? If price were not an issue, why wouldn't we buy a zillion DACTA TECHNIC sets? could/should the adult community focus on that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: EpII Slave 1 - A.O.K. -- attn: Matt Sekerak
"Matthew Sekerak" <matthew.sekerak@verizon.net> wrote in message news:Gv7JDo.ECp@lugnet.com... (...) I just got ep II Slave I and I'm looking for ideas to modify it. This link looked promising, but it's dead now. Can you pictures of you mod back up (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
(...) yeah, I'm aware of the name change, but for some reason I refuse to adopt it. ..chock it up to nostalgia. and too long of a name. I still say SYSTEM, DUPLO and TOOLO too. (...) lol. that's not funny, but it made me laugh. never heard that (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Building Philosophy: Bricks vs. Beams (was Re: Technic's Dead)
(...) Oh, sure. I agree with that. It's having enough beams that's the problem! (...) Well, it just depends on what you need for a given situation. Studs can really help, if you need them. If not, they're just an added complication. But you're (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Building Philosophy: Bricks vs. Beams (was Re: Technic's Dead)
(...) Yes, that's true. It's disappointing to get a set with little or no Technic bricks in it. I think one frustrating thing about the new pieces (and I'm thinking of studless beams as well as liftarms, or 1/2 width "beams") is that because there's (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Mindstorms Profitability, Demise of Technic, Bleak Future
(...) When Mindstorms came out, I bought it immediately. Then I bought another. I sorted out my childhood LEGO collection and found it wanting. The search for additional parts began. The [expansion for making bugs, whatever it was called] was lousy (...) (22 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: WH40k Dreadnaughts and Tau Crisis Battle Suit
(...) Very nice. For another take on the Space Marine dread check out. (URL) it has the opposite prob to yours, it's too big. That and it sits a 'fig inside because I used it for brikwars and making the pilot dead/sealed in wasn't covered in the (...) (22 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.gaming, lugnet.build.mecha)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
(...) Jumping in with constructive comments is never redundant. :) (...) My best guess is that most consumers (perhaps even some "adult LEGO fans") aren't either aware of DACTA or aren't informed as to how it can be ordered by an individual. My one (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Building Philosophy: Bricks vs. Beams (was Re: Technic's Dead)
(...) I totally agree! I think I overdid it. I totally agree that beams and bricks have their uses, I just don't like how Lego is making the beam 'superioir' these days. The thing that ticks me off, though, is flex axles and 'styling panels.' I just (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

		Re: Building Philosophy: Bricks vs. Beams (was Re: Technic's Dead)
(...) Whatever. For building purposes its ratio is approximately 1:1. Leave the micrometer out of it ;-) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

dead
(score: 0.348)

More: Next Page >>