Results 2581 – 2600 of about 6600.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) An excellent post, Dave. A few things I want to touch on - the Admins' basic idea of how the P&P process would work is essentially what you described here. We write it, work on it. Share it with a few people and get their input, get the (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) I posted this already but this is not the impression that I got from the announcement post or various other conversions with those involved. The impression I got was that the committee was going to generate the P&P and then it would be (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) Isn't it possible for people to discuss something even if it is currently being implemented? Or is it the point that something should be submitted to the community before implementation just for the sake of it? In which case, does the (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) In my opinion, no, especially if the implementation directly affect those whould would discuss it. For example: The club you belong to forms a committee to review the dress code. It just so happens (by coincidenece) that everyone on the (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) I'm sorry Marc, but the idea of Admins inhibiting discussion on Lugnet is laughable. When have we ever done that or attempted to do that? Admins cannot force edits or cancels - but can only do so when requested by a member. And if the (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) To me, "abiding by the unfair ban while arguing with the committee" is a worthwhile thing to do. Since, this might happen even if the policy is submitted to the membership. TO use your example - what if you are gone on the day the ban is (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Perl rules!
|
| (...) Much as I would like to believe that sometimes IBM and MS are capable of creating something (1), this is one thing they simply grabbed and ran with. The *need* was already there; they simply told consumers that the *want* was there, only a few (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Perl rules!
|
| (...) Actually, it would have been a hell of a lot easier, given that you at elast have homogeneous address space. But you do need to rewrite the kernel to be able to access it at all, and we all know how fast MS is at that sorta thing.. (...) And (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Zapped Firmware
|
| -Apparently I have twice erased my firmware by putting a heavy load on motors attached to the RCX. The batteries do not appear to be dead. Is this normal behavior? -JW Jonathan Woodward woodward@guesswork.com (URL) find your (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Homing with the IR Tower
|
| A while ago I was intrigued by the soda can retrieval challenge. Particularly because at that time I had built two different designs of grip-and-lift claws: The first is based on the bar-code truck claw. It uses the flex system and lifts things (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) Again, I'm at work, and can't give this better attention until tonight if I get the chance, but: While this may be true in theory, it seems that many here **think** that the establishment is not interested in their opinions, and may feel (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Interactive human-controlled bots
|
| At a local toystore last night, they had a big setup of Rokenbok (a pseudo-LEGO-compatible construction toy system) with a bunch of radio- controlled dump-trucks, ramps, bridges, balls to move around, and so forth. OK, Rokenbok certainly leaves a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) Not if the policy being implemented has the effect of inhibiting discussion or making that discussion irrelevant. Marc Nelson Jr. (URL) Marc's Creations>> (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: What happened to my posting setup?
|
| (...) That shouldn't be why, no. You must have toasted some settings in your newsreader or emailer or something like that. Let me take a look at the dead-articles log on the server and see if it has any clues... Hmm, there aren't any rejected (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) Well, the movie did have one advantage over the book: It didn't have to start the very first scene with the apalling retcon of how Ian (?) the mathemagician really _isn't_ dead. Other than that... both the book and the movie, even compared to (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) Rosa Parks did what she did because the establishment was not interested in hearing her voice. Lugnet Admins, on the other hand, have always be interested in hearing the voices of all members and users of Lugnet. I don't see the need for civil (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | OS advocacy (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
| (...) Right, I think it's a bad argument tactic to suggest that Macs are cheaper than Intel hardware. It just ain't so. But, they are faster, more reliable, easier to use, easier to maintain, less reliant on MS (which matters to some), and home to (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
|
| | Re: URL characters
|
| Jacob Sparre Andersen skrev i meddelandet ... (...) for (...) It has nothing to do with different software (MS or others), it's in the keyboard driver (OK, that's probably MS). On a Swedish keyboard '~' is a 'dead char', which is automatically (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.212)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
