Results 1121 1140 of about 3100.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) How many persons? (...) So are public restrooms. Are you against separating those? (...) For what possible reason? That is downright strange. (...) Well, that "church" has some issues. (...) lol "evolution of society"? Are you so sure our (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
| | Re: A first step
|
| "Mark Jordan" <mark.jordan@oracle.com> wrote in message news:I1G0KI.vK2@lugnet.com... (...) Congratulations, that is a fun moment. (...) basic (...) she (...) of (...) together. (...) She (...) will give (...) I don't think so. I have four kids (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) The state should recognize marraige as a contract between persons, no matter their sexual affiliation. If the Church wants to put quantifiers on that contract, i.e. one person must be female, and the other must be male, all the power to the (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) I'll admit that it's pretty thin, but there is a distinction nonetheless. By refusing to perform same-sex marriages, the Church is not refusing to perform weddings for gays at all. They're just refusing to perform weddings between them. (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
| | Re: MOC: Space Police II Prison Train
|
| (...) Pfff, those Super-B Blacktron-wannabes are the vanilla of bad-guys. They need about as much legal supervision as a church youth group. Anyways, I really like the blend between recognizable real-world train structure and futuristic styling, and (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
| |
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) Marital status is a non-discrimination item, but that doesn't prevent the Catholic church from refusing to marry a divorced person. They can't be required to perform the ceremony if they can't be required to recognize the union, and forcing (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| church (score: 0.474) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) I recognize that the law requires boys to pee in one place and girls to pee in another, but I can't really think of a solid reason that this should be so, other than because people can be quaintly immature about functions involving the (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:I15rpI.1v7n@lugnet.com... (...) pee in (...) so, (...) involving the (...) in the (...) I'm with you on this one. I visited a dorm at MIT that had a co-ed bathroom, that had multiple stalls (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) Let's hope not :) If stated so, I have a hunch lots of people would start migrating over to the liberal side :) (...) Well, I doubt that's John's point since I don't think he's interested in making other laws to: - attend church on Sunday - (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| church (score: 0.473) |
|
|
| church (score: 0.473) | More: Next Page >>
|