Subject:
|
Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:41:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1805 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
I’m not sure this is how it should be in the US with our legal precident.
If sexual preference is a fully protected non-discrimination item, then
private churches won’t be able to refuse to marry them. Maybe this is what
folks like John are actually fearing.
|
Marital status is a non-discrimination item, but that doesn’t prevent the
Catholic church from refusing to marry a divorced person. They can’t be
required to perform the ceremony if they can’t be required to recognize the
union, and forcing them to do so by law is prohibited by the 1st Amendment.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) I'm not sure this is how it should be in the US with our legal precident. If sexual preference is a fully protected non-discrimination item, then private churches won't be able to refuse to marry them. Maybe this is what folks like John are (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
