To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 841 – 860 of about 136000.
Search took 0.03 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: LUGNET is moving servers once more
 
(...) hi jerry i just read u mesage so the problem was just the old hardaware server that cause problems and thats why that message in lugnet.com thanks fore clearing that out But i still dont understand why i cant download lego instructions at (...) (5 years ago, 1-Nov-20, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

all
(score: 0.862)

  Re: LUGNET is moving servers once more
 
(...) Hi Marco, I must have phrased it in a confusing way then - the announcement was meant to say that the site was moved 1:1 - so the fact that we are reading and writing here means that LUGNET _is_ actually now running on a cloud-based server. (...) (5 years ago, 31-Oct-20, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

all
(score: 0.862)

  Not a Dinner Post....
 
It's been a half a year since I last posted. However, LUGNET is never far from my mind... So I post! Hope everyone is well... most of my friends that I chatted with here are on my facebook so chatting is going on over there... But I miss posting... (...) (5 years ago, 29-Oct-20, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

all
(score: 0.862)

  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) I'm not. Until they have explicit permission from TLC to register a domain name containing their trademarked brand name, it would be a blatant violation of trademark rights to do so. Not a good way to start off this proposed relationship with (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.862)

  Biggest private collection of LEGO in Britain
 
Hey Brickish folks, Saw a story 1:42PM BST 23 Sep 2008 (URL) private collection of two million bricks of Lego" A toy-mad collector and Star Wars fan has amassed Britain's biggest private collection of Lego - containing over two million bricks. (...) (17 years ago, 24-Sep-08, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
 

rights
(score: 0.862)

  Re: THE FOUNDRY . . .
 
(...) You are very correct. I cannot label a toy "valkyrie" or "Zaku" if they are trademarked or copyrighted. But in this case they are not. If you go to the US Patent and Trademark Office and do a search you will note that "Zaku" is nowhere to be (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
 

rights, property
(score: 0.862)

  Re: Once again, even with all our problems, Canada--a great place to live...
 
Hi all, it's been a while! The subject of this post seems curious to me. Canada is a great place...why? Dave, are you reacting to the court's decision or to this journalist's gushing? The way I see it, the writing in that piece was sub par in that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.860)

  Re: This is where I actually want a gun
 
(...) HA, don't let the Libs hear you say that;-) (...) But herein lies the rub. Does the punishment fit the crime? A 3 time drug abuser can get about the same length sentence (depending upon the ages of the criminals-- hey, life is only so long). (...) (22 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.860)

  Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
 
(...) Not exactly. More like it IS everything else. Any right I recognise, ultimately, is a property right or can be reduced to one. (...) Well, here we go round the mulberry bush again, :-) but as I stated in the past, I don't accept the above as a (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights, property
(score: 0.860)

  Re: Once again, even with all our problems, Canada--a great place to live...
 
(...) What makes the court decision remarkable is that they actually made a decision that's rational, instead of politically expedient. You may have found the writing sub-par, but then you may not know the actual author of the article, Rachel Sa. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.860)

  Re: To change the tune...
 
By and large, I agree with DaveK's attack on our president. He lied to us and I believe, still, that he is a bad man. But that doesn't change the fact that Saddam Hussein is also a bad man. Really bad! I do believe that the world is a better place (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.860)

  Peanuts on Airplanes (was Re:Skin)
 
(...) So this is an interesting example, because the negative effects are pretty well understood, and the costs of an alternative are pretty well understood. Of course what may not be so understood is how many other substances can cause fatal (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.860)

  Re: Once again, even with all our problems, Canada--a great place to live...
 
(...) Well, before we get into what I personally consider decent, the Ontario courts ruled a while back that the exposure of breasts in certain public areas (basically any public area where, say, a man can legally go topless) is decent, and is now (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.859)

  Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
 
(...) There are two basic thrusts that I'll take with this. First, and what I expect to me more convincing/interesting to the "pro-spank" or "parents' rights" crowd, is that it produces long-term deleterious motivational effects. It seems that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.859)

  Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
 
(...) But you're making a ridiculous comparison. An action by a person that produces a substantially unhealthy state for others is very different than one who does not. The occurrances of people reacting to the sight of a naked body, even a (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.859)

  Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
 
(...) Marriage is also a formal statement of interpersonal committment, and the legal recognition of marriage entitles the spouse to benefits and responsibilities not available to non-spouses. (...) No need for that; many same-sex couples already (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.859)

  Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
 
What follows is not my best writing... I used a lot of that up today working on deliverables for my client and for BrickFest PDX. But it's a great topic and I wanted to take one more swing before I went to bed... (...) I know Chris didn't completely (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.859)

  Re: Ikros and Copyright Infringement
 
(...) I believe the 20% rule applies to all parts of the music, not just the piece as a whole. Cutting out every fifth part doesn't count. If you use just the drum line, that drum line would still have to be 20% different (and yes, "20%" is tricky (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.858)

  Re: Disclaimer
 
(...) Here is a "can disclaimer" that I use on all of my BIs. Note that I DO NOT SELL my BIs DISCLAIMER All content is provided as is, with no warranty stated or implied regarding the quality or accuracy of any content.  All trademarks, service (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, FTX)
 

all, property
(score: 0.858)

  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) I still would like to respect the author's choice not to have the raw DAT code posted, it is after all his/her property. -Orion (22 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, property
(score: 0.858)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR