|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.044) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.041) |
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) For one thing, I did not commit to refuting this particular point within your basic premise. That was another thread. For another, I said there that I would accept your basic premise that "all rights are property rights" You're trying to turn (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.038) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.035) |
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) Read what I wrote carefully. It adresses material *submitted* to the Library. That means you have no control over what Brickshelf does with it's copies of what you submit. In other words, you can't revoke your submission, or suddenly decide (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.030) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.029) |
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) If you think they're worth doing, by all means, please go ahead. However since they involve transfers of wealth from one person to another, my position is that you ought to do them on your nickel, not mine. I am not my brother's keeper unless (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.028) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.027) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.022) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.022) |
|
| | Re: An aside on the "Plagiarism" thread...
|
| Actually, it does make sense to "copyright" your designs. Let me explain: By placing a copyright notice on your webpage, you indicate that the original content (i.e. your creative ideas) is your intellectual property. Anyone who does not ask (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.022) |
|
| | rights to SW pieces
|
| A couple of months ago, there was some string going around about who owned the rights to the SW lego pieces. I happened to be checking out Ben Rogers' SW lego sight and he had some really nice scans of the club magazine that's released in the UK. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.020) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.019) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.018) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.017) |
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Fundamentally, I see no problem whatsoever in animals having and being given property rights. As to what happens to the estate when Fido dies without issue? What happens when your kid who inherited your estate dies without issue? We have (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.017) |
|
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
| (...) <snipped the adultery bit> (...) Determined by a judicial process... so once again, you need a judiciary... and because your theoretical system is dynamic, values for transgressions need to be determined each and every time, so it's going to (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.016) |
|
| | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) I could argue this further, but we'd be getting away from traceable cause and effect, and getting really esoteric. (which is to say, getting into questions like 'Where does the concept of God come from' and 'Does the socio-political effect of (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.016) |
|
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| (...) Good points. I post on off-topic.debate irregularly, but view it often. If o-t.debate wasn't there it wouldn't worry me. However, like driving past a traffic accident, I try to ignore it - but I am constantly drawn back. The views expressed (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 6.015) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 6.012) |