Set Reference Set Reference (Popup) Parts Reference News

Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1221 – 1240 of about 136000. Search took 0.03 CPU seconds.  Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) That's fine, but I am going to try to show that life-affirming REQUIRES property rights because of the nature of man. That is, to not recognise them is to be anti life affirming, or in other words if you want to be human, you have to recognise (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.800)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) First, I want to make a distinction between "not life-affirming" and "anti life-affirming." It's possible for something to not necessarily go out of it's way to affirm life, yet not deny it either. Anyway: There may be potential rights that (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.800)    Where did all the fun go?   The last few weeks of activity here, sitewide, per the automation, have been the automation posting the activity stats. And that's it. There is one post a month about dinner. What we need is something stirring up some fun. (7 years ago, 27-Dec-17, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)     all (score: 0.800)    Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)   (...) Not a right to support (at least in any but the vaguest of senses) just a right to a place. In what I understand of libertopia, it would be theoretically possible for one person to buy up all the land and not allow anyone else to be there. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, property (score: 0.800)    Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)   (...) What I am talking abouit is where I use a desktop-class machine, sold by say Compaq (because I have a contract with them to supply all my machinery), instead of the server class machine or router they wopuld otherwise have sold me. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.800)    The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)   (...) Buried in that other people aren't contributing their thoughts because they're too wrapped up in the more emotionally satisfying debates about unsolvable situations in the Middle East? Or buried in that _you_ are too busy in the other thread? (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, property (score: 0.800)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   OK, we need to back up. (...) Can you restate this? Are you stating that there are rights, or that there should be rights, that are not life affirming, that is, that are actually "wrong" using the "morally good" = "valid" = "life affirming" test? Or (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.799)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) I'm OK with that. (...) Reminder, under the premise we agreed upon, if it requires force initiation, it's not a right. This will be used to eliminate some things tentatively labeled rights, below. (...) not sure I understand the question. A (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.799)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) Yes. But fraud is a crime against you that takes PROPERTY away. I tried to kill this one once but Matt is right, without the "you have the right to have property" right, this one is slippery and he can keep wiggling all day long. I can claim (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.799)    Re: Still time to enter the LEGO Train Contest   In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee wrote to remind us of the Train Contest. While I applaud that LEGO has chosen to recognize the Train enthusiasts (including the "over 18" builders :-), I'm a bit disappointed in the claus that forces the builders to (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.trains)   all, rights (score: 0.799)    Re: Freedom from information   (...) In the interest of full disclosure, I must admit that I haven't listened to him at all for several years, except for an occasional snippet while I'm driving. When I did listen, he played at least as fast-and-loose with facts as Moore does, and (...) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights (score: 0.799)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) Can you at least quick state your answers to the first two questions I asked, so the problem is clear? (If you don't want to argue from a natural rights basis, I need to ask some different questions.) (...) I will be there. But, I'd rather (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.799)    Re: 'Lego Ban' at Seattle School Fueled by Anti-Private Property Crusaders   (...) Good grief! Somebody needs to go back and re-educate these teachers! As an educator myself, I find it ridiculous that LEGO was banned. I don't see other building toys banned here...and isn't it LEGO that has things like First LEGO League, (...) (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)   property (score: 0.799)    Re: 'Lego Ban' at Seattle School Fueled by Anti-Private Property Crusaders   (...) Hmm. If I was a kid in this class I'd steal my teacher's car. How could they press charges, given their professed beliefs? Bruce (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   property (score: 0.799)    IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)   (...) You can see content when you "view source"... Anyway, how do you make that view jive with your copyright views? Let's get back to those, in a separate thread. I can't even find the appropriate posts anymore. You've said earlier that you think (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.799)    Lego copyrights native language   From (URL) could corner Maori names 10 April 2001 By JONATHAN MILNE International toy company Lego could now prevent Maori from marketing toys with Maori names, intellectual property law specialist John Hackett said yesterday. "If a New Zealand (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)   rights, property (score: 0.798)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) I should point out that I accept "life-affirming" as a test for whether something is good or bad, not for whether it exists. (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.798)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) We're not stuck on this planet. You can, with current technology, go to the moon/Mars and live there. It would merely cost immense amounts of money, but that's irrelevant. (...) Given that the notion of 'country' historically really rests on (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.798)    Lego copyrights native language   ----- Original Message ----- From: Trevor Alvey <talvey@gte.net> Newsgroups: lugnet.general,lugnet.loc.nz Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:19 PM Subject: Lego copyrights native language From (URL) Lego could corner Maori names 10 April 2001 By (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)   rights, property (score: 0.798)    Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?   (...) Yes, the social contract argument is one that's familiar to me and in fact has been advanced here in this very group before, although not very crisply, to my way of thinking. It was more along the lines of "my country, love it or leave it" (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)   all, rights, property (score: 0.798) More:  Next Page >>

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR