|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) I agree with you. I don't think that's the argument, though. I would expect that a defense of "we truly believed this was a good insulator, our research aligned with everyone elses" ought to carry some weight. Not get the company off scot (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
| | A&M Productions name change
|
| In the process of making my software company, A&M Productions, becoming a Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) I need to ensure that the A&M Productions name is being used properly. As such all of my copyright notices on my animations, images, (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-03, to lugnet.announce)
| |
| all, property (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| property (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) From what (and how) I've read no-one has claimed that murfling is eroding anyone's rights. They have claimed that the term is a euphemistic way of saying censored and that the use of euphemism is bad (at least from my reading). From your (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| rights (score: 0.801) |
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) Todd coined it. Altho it has since become a "bad" word, he intended it to sound a little silly. The rest of the admins loved it, expecting that the community would accept it as a compromise between no cursing and free speech. It still amazes (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| rights (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.801) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 0.800) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.800) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 0.800) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 0.800) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.800) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 0.800) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.800) |
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Well, here's an important distinction: who's doing the saying? And in what capacity? Let's say AFOLS.com is run by Mortimer. And a frequent visitor to the AFOLS.com is Jezebelle. And there's another site called LEGOGEEKS.com, which they hate. (...) (18 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| rights (score: 0.800) |