|
 | | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) You keep making these claims, but I have seen no evidence of such (debate within science on if evolution happens). You are welcome to submit such (gotta be accredited scientists in scientific journals - spare me the religious crackpots). You, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) First - I've never said "leading" scientists, since that is always open to debate. I understand your thoughts/feelings on this - however, with this thread I'm trying to establish what it is that I should be addressing regarding evolution - (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) I don't for an instant imagine that you won't attack what I say, but that's not the point with my opening post. Nor have I attempted to cite any evidence yet one way or the other. All I'm trying to do is state the tenants of macro evolution as (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) not (...) your (...) In other words, you can't back up your claims. You only want to stick to the subject if you get the last word ("Hardly - which wasn't on topic, but I wanted to have a zinger without a rejoinder"). Don't lecture me on what (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) No Bruce - give me a break - if you can't establish the basis for a discussion there is no discussion. I'll be glad to backup my claims when I make them. For the 4th time - Do you accept my statements as descriptive of the key questions of the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| Jon and Bruce are exasperating each other without getting very far, so I thought I'd go back to the beginning of the thread and look at Jon's original statements. I may be falling into his trap, that's OK. I've done it to him before so I guess it's (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) Just following *your* lead. (...) You've been challenged on your extravagant claims of support or lack of support for either side many times by many people and have never offered any shred of proof. You'll continue to dodge the question. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | FS: Black 4x3 low slopes in Bulk!
|
| I just added *200* 4x3 black low slopes to my Brickbay store. It took me more than a few thousand dollars to collect these babies; they are near impossible to get in these quantities. So get'em while you can! All are in mint condition. (URL) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) Thank you. (...) REVISED: 1) Do strata (layers of sediment) support a progressive, over millennia, approach which reveals the progression (simple forms leading to more complicated forms) of life through time? Or is there a better explanation (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
|
| (...) evolution (...) Back up to the beginning and note Larry's comments - I've responded and I think that's where we can start. Meanwhile you might read Tim's post... I wanted to establish a basis for the discussion before presenting evidence - (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) I still have a quibble, to wit, with the use of "progression" and/or the use of "simple to more complicated". That's the way that it seems to have come out in this case, but that's not necessarily an implication. If conditions change radically (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) Ok - REVISED AGAIN: 1) Do strata (layers of sediment) support a progressive, over millennia, approach which reveals the progression (simple forms leading to more complicated forms, or vice versa: one type changing into another type) of life (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: my moc: VIA F40PH
|
| (...) The problem with the grilles on this engine is that they follow up the slopes thus impossible to do in lego :( (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| | Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) IANAP (I am not a paleontologist), but I'm not sure that the fossil record shows either of these things. It shows the spatial and historical pattern of life on earth (what lived where, when), but we can only infer the evolutionary process from (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.883)
|
|
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.882)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| I have seen ET, and we is he! ;-) Actually, considering the vast #s of chemicals/compounds available in the Soup of Space, it would not surprise me at all to find out that life here originated from Seed Matter from space. After all, the universe had (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.882)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) Coupled with the evidence I heard that mamalian amino acids appeared to have come from space as well (I.E. specifically mamalian amino acids didn't develop here on Earth), it makes even more sense. Also with the fact that both here and on (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.882)
|
|
| | Re: S@H woes
|
| Guess what? Those S@H menus don't work in IE 4 either. (Time to upgrade?) It turns out, IE 4 can't even be used on Microsoft's website anymore because too many links are implemented as javascript actions instead of, um, links. For instance, it's (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.882)
|
|
| | Re: The Royal Train Website
|
| (...) It's also the reason we trainheads say "all themes are just spare parts for Trains" :-). In particular: (URL) which uses a LOT of castle. (in its proper place, fancy bridge parts) I think this is my favorite shot of the whole gallery, there is (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
impossible
(score: 0.882)
|
