To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *85600 (-20)
  Re: train patterned parts
 
(...) Visually these patterned parts look good, but does the pattern really have a black edge around it ? My examples of the rail logo do not. IMHO we only code type 2 lines at surface intersections, not at changes of colour on the same surface. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Solo 48...
 
"Giulio Ferrari" <giuliof@iol.it> wrote in message news:385D2431.E1A6CD...@iol.it... (...) Cosa è il LegoCenter di Parma? -- Cheers Carlo. LUGNET member page: (URL) member of ItLUG: (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
 
  Re: Enough already
 
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) I agree with you. No one can disagree with what you said. But why "shoot the messenger"? I prefer to be outwardly optimistic, and reserve cynicism. Just my personality..... (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Vintage Wheel Set 021
 
I have this set at home. I believe its complete (but can't be 100% sure, since its older than I am). I will let you know what is in it. -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) Summers wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Right. But let's not forget that many of us are FAR more enamored of Lego the PRODUCT than Lego the company. Aside from some recent slips in quality control (colors, mostly) Lego the PRODUCT has never let us down. Lego the COMPANY, though, has (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Availability of new castle?
 
Nephilim wrote in message ... (...) bother (...) I see. If I would open these things I would know, but if its not Castle, then what's the point?! -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Ritocchi al sito ItLUG
 
(...) Non scherziamo. E' vero quello che dici, lo standard GIF è protetto da copyright, ma la faccenda è nota già da qualche anno, e milioni di immagini GIF continuano ad essere usate in tutto il mondo, pardon la rete, senza che si siano posti (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
 
  Re: Solo 48...
 
(...) Mi sembrano francamente pochi, visto che hanno fatto un'edizione in Italiano apposta, e lanciato il prodotto per Natale, con tanto di pubblicità in TV... (...) Mi hanno detto che al LegoCenter di Parma ne hanno alcuni, a 487.500 lire (molto (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
 
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
Nope, not going to follow up, as it's obvious that you are hopelessly incorrect about this ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: varie ed eventuali
 
(...) Ho studiato il problema per svariati anni. Il risultato è che la posizione standard è quella con la parte più grande in alto (rappresenta il pollice) e la parte arrotondata sotto. Ovviamente possono ruotare di circa 90 gradi per parte, a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
 
  Re: lego.com hopelessly out of date?
 
(...) No this cant be the case as Lego themselves are selling the sets, in their UK store at least. regards lawrence (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
 
(...) Bull ;-) TLC will just price the bulk pieces high enough so that this is not economically viable. I just can't imagin them selling bulk parts for less than $.10-.20 on average, as that is what they cost in sets these days. -- Tom Stangl (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Vintage Wheel Set 021
 
I am new to collecting Lego. I played with them a lot as a child, but now want to collect as an adult. Anyhow, I came across a large amount of old sets (Gears, Small vehicles, Windows and Doors, Building sets, etc.) There is one set that I cannot (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Jasper Janssen wrote: [RE: my hopeful dreamin' that LEGO will redesign their site for better usability and not for better security with obnoxious bells and whistles] (...) Well, to be honest, with the crew of designers they (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: General Box #5
 
I now have GB 5 in my possession, and have sorted through it. I'm going to figure out what to put in it and repack it in a sturdier box later today. Once I get Thomas Main's address, I'll send it on. -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
 
  Re: Minifig box 2
 
(...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
 
  Re: DixieLUG gathering
 
(...) you bet we could, todd! if only such a thing existed... ;-) i had trouble trying to crosspost this tho'. when i typed lugnet.org.us into the follow up box, the message wasn't acceppted. later ~ craig~ (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ga, lugnet.loc.us)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Yah Rose! I'll add my support behind everything she said. Three cheers for Rose for the courage to write it! Kevin Loch has done wonders with his site, and his self-imposed restrictions make perfect sense to me. When I read Brad's note, I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Enough already
 
Todd Lehman wrote in message <385ce0d5.267874625@...et.com>... (...) Well put, Todd. After reading all this, including my wife's post, here's my "boiled-down" philosophy: 1) Brad (and his employer, TLG), have begun a dialog with us. Hasn't this been (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Skipped 4 messages in groups lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR