 | | Re: Language slipping?
|
|
(...) EGAD!!! Maybe our Republican Conservative leaders are right! Maybe we are "slouching towards Gomorrah"! :-) <----- (A debauched expression.) Gary Istok (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) Too true. And in the interest of equality, why don't they make printed muscle-bound males to go with these ambitiously-drawn female figures? How are we supposed to make hulking barbarians? Is this some sort of TLG bias? All in fun, Dave! (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) But, but, Hollywood says that all people in the middle ages were beautiful. That must make it true! James (URL) not an actor, but I play one on TV..." (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
I don´t like her torso print. It´s too... well, you probably know what I mean. and lego babes shouldn´t look like that. In Paradisa, none of the girl minifigs looked like that. --Tobias (...) 2000 (...) work (...) to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Ritocchi al sito ItLUG
|
|
(...) Le immagini vanno anche troppo bene complimenti, la cosina un po' bruttina :-) se mi permetti, e' quel frame di cui ti avevo parlato. Ora pero' mi viene un dubbio, non saro' percaso il solo a vederlo ? Io come browser uso netscape 4.6 in (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: c'e' gente simpatica in giro che non ha nulla di buono da fare
|
|
(...) E meno male che ci considerano cosi' :-) Pensa cosa succederebbe se ci fossero italo-anglo-americani... che curiosi di quello che diciamo noi italiani si mettessero a tradurre tutti i messaggi che circolano in lugnet.loc.it. (non fate caso ai (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Il chaffigo...
|
|
(...) Tutto merito tuo :-) Speriamo solo che non ci siano italo-inglesi. (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO on the news
|
|
(...) interested. (...) They did a really nice job in putting together the story. The final version was around 2 minutes in length. It included some overview shots as well as close-ups of my layout; a sneak peek at Scott's great Technic and Model (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.mo.kan)
|
| |
| | Re: Language slipping?
|
|
(...) group, here folks, or something to that effect. Scott "Always has flame proof shielding on" Sanburn ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn CAD Operator Affiliated Engineers, Inc. Work Page: (URL) Page: (URL) LEGO Page: (URL) to come: Star Wars LEGO Sets (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: e-Commerce, Entertainer, Exchange rate
|
|
(...) Did you get this resolved? Just curious. It seems like the credit card company should be willing to resolve this. (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Cool Y2K set observations
|
|
I recently picked up a few Y2K set. Here are a few unmentioned notes of interest. The artic combo set is a monstrosity of juniorizaton. It does have a polar bear, two parka dudes, a neon orange scorpion, and a trans blue spider. The A-wing and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Language slipping?
|
|
Hmm. Hate to be the guy who calls this out, but I've noticed a higher than normal use of "casual use" vulgarity in the last few weeks. Not really from any single "offender" or anything, nor used in a particularly offensive way, but it's there. Just (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Good starting train set
|
|
I know I probably should ask this question in lugnet.trains, but then I'd get suggestions that were unavailable in the UK. So I hope people don't mind me asking here. I'm looking to get into Trains, what would be a good set to start with? I know (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Another part variation
|
|
(...) Many moons ago on RTL, someone from Europe (I can't remember who it was.) pointed out that the "horn" piece in Technic models is NOT the same as the palm-tree segment, the difference being the Technic version had inner tabs that would lock a (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Gungan "energy ball" ammo (was "Re: Updated again")
|
|
(...) Well, I was just sizing the movie to the minifigs. (...) Not really. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn CAD Operator Affiliated Engineers, Inc. Work Page: (URL) Page: (URL) LEGO Page: (URL) to come: Star Wars LEGO Sets Parts Selling Page! (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | 2000 LEGO
|
|
Hello all, I'm just wondering if anyone in CO has seen any 2000 sets. I've been checking the Fort Collins Toys R Us, Target, Walmart, and a couple of small independent toy stores. No luck so far, even in finding out any information on when they (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.co)
|
| |
| | Re: Opions on the 4561
|
|
Oops, I mean 'opinions'. Steve (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Gungan "energy ball" ammo (was "Re: Updated again")
|
|
(...) Too big. I don't see what the problem is- 1x1 rounds have always been cannonballs, and no one's complained. (...) Speaking of too big, any chance you might cut down on the size of your .sig? eric (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Scout
|
|
(...) (yuhuuu (...) Potresti come minimo partire leggendoti la sezione FAQ di www.itlug.org, così magari mi dimostri che non ho lavorato per niente a scrivere risposte a domande del tipo "cos'é lo Scout?" :-))) Mario (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
