 | | Mockup: Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double(4560) P# m456moc1.dat [DAT]
|
|
this is a mockup till i figure out how to get the part (lego customer service HAHHAH) sorry tore, had to hack this part.. 0 Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double 0 Name: m456moc1.dat 0 Author: thomas burger (tburger666@aol.com) 0 hacked a few parts,Hacked (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Mike, You beat my response by 3 minutes and we said basically the same thing. We've been working on the same things for so long we are starting to think alike. Scary huh?! :) Robert (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Mockup: Train Front 14 x 6 (4560) P# 10036 [DAT]
|
|
this is a mockup till i figure out how to get the part (lego customer service HAHHAH) 0 Train Element 14 x 6 With nosefront (mockup) 0 10036.dat 2 24 -40 16 -110 40.05 16 -110 2 24 -38 16 -110 -38 4 -110 2 24 -38 4 -110 -20 4 -110 2 24 -20 4 -110 (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Ed, LEGO does not use IrDA protocol but this is not the problem with OmniRemote. OmniRemote simply records any IR it detects at training and transmits a copy of the signals no matter what format they are in. I believe the two main problems with (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Ends Soon: Red Train Window Frames
|
|
Check out this lot of 10 red 1x3x4 train windows-- price is still low! Go to Train Pieces: (URL) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Ed, yes the RCX is acknowledging most commands. It does not do this with the commands used in LRemote ((URL) -- I'm stuck on the old name too, for the same reason). The motor commands used in LRemote are repeating commands. As long as you hold down (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's security (Was: Re: What the F.......)
|
|
(...) Ummm...Can't we just let Todd do his thing and assume that he knows what he is doing? No offense, Dan, but that was a strange thing to do -- especially in light of the RTL post from (I hope) an imposter. Its one thing to have an honest and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Brad Justus is real
|
|
(...) Brad, I'm very sorry this happened. It seems that cheap attention is easy to be had these days. I wish LEGO the best of luck in determining the source of the forgery on Usenet/rec.toys.lego and hope that it does not discourage the ongoing (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Implementing Finite State Machines
|
|
Dave, I like the idea of teaching how to solve certain problems both with multiple threads and with a Finite State Machine. Adding "switch" would be great! Personally I think that a plain 'C' FSM using switch can be made to look very clear if (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: What the F.......
|
|
(...) The woman who does quality assurance for my company has a cable modem with a Media One account. She lives in Cambridge or Somerville, I think. - chris (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Space Shuttle Set for Sale at ZanyBrainy!
|
|
Zany Brainy, San Diego CA, had 17 sets remaining as of 4:00PM PST today, Sat 12/11/99. Location is Mission Valley. Still half price at $75. Al Thiele (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's security (Was: Re: What the F.......)
|
|
(...) Yes, obviously. That's why the rule in the T&C. --Todd (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What the F.......
|
|
(...) Hear Hear. (...) The only defence we've got may be just that - some measure of traceability of messages that are posted. As for a)why someone would do this, and b)how it can be prevented, I don't think there are real answers to those questions (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's security (Was: Re: What the F.......)
|
|
Thanks. I knew what I was doing when posting the message and just thought you should know it can be done (which you probably do). While I did it under good intentions, some else could do it under bad intentions and if it can be done, someone will do (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V1.6 IS AVAILABLE NOW ****
|
|
(...) I like the splash screen. is the .dat file of the cool looking jeep available anywhere? -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What the F.......
|
|
(...) Well, I will. I want to have this on record in case the message on Usenet gets cancelled somehow. This is serious. Here are the headers: ------begin------ Path: reader2.news.rcn.net...ed.berkele y.edu!netnews.com!ch...ne.net!24. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's security (Was: Re: What the F.......)
|
|
(...) Dan: Just so you know, what you just did is grounds for removal. Please do not ever do it again, even to make a point. Obviously you meant well but this is an extremely important rule not to violate. To repeat from the discussion group T&C, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What the F.......
|
|
(...) Lego DOES have an email address. I have it and have sent them email. They just don't give it out because they don't want to be flooded with email from people who want to buy 2 purple 2x2 tiles or something else. (...) I don't think you really (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Lugnet's security (Was: Re: What the F.......)
|
|
If this idiot from Mediaone.net was a little smarter, he could have faked Brad Justus's post even here as I just did: (URL) please delete the above message. I think everyone should be assigned a password to post here so you couldn't impersonate (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What the F.......
|
|
In response to myself: I WAS WRONG. LEGODIRECT AND BRAD JUSTUS (The legitimate one) DO EXIST. Just wanted to help clear this up. The hoax is the retraction posted to RTL, not the posts to Lugnet from Brad Justus. Note: I will not be deleting my (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
