 | | Re: lego Technic "class"
|
|
(...) Did the autopsie show what killed the motor? Play well! Marcus --- Marcus Fischer Mellbin E-mail: marcus no-spam-at fischer-mellbin.com (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaurs!
|
|
(...) dinosaurs to (...) You still deserve that six-pack of nothin' Pete. And the minifig of yourself. Cheers, Mark L (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Research, HELP!
|
|
(URL) site is changing hands soon, so it might be down if you try) -Ben (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.edu)
|
| |
| | Re: building a maze
|
|
(...) You could make it with LEGO Duplo. That's how I make large constructions such as mountains. Play well! Marcus --- Marcus Fischer Mellbin E-mail: marcus no-spam-at fischer-mellbin.com (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
|
(...) Whups! You're right. The page before is Scala, though, and that's what I used as a reference. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! It's a moot point for me, really, since neither Belville nor Scala are available in Canada. James (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 lego stuff
|
|
(...) You mean lugnet.town.arctic? (Arctic is a play theme within LEGO SYSTEM Town.) What I wanna learn is whether Futbol is a new system or whether it's part of Town... --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
|
(...) No, it is Belville. TLG calls it Belville, and the 'figs are Belville Figs. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on 2000 SW
|
|
(...) Agreed. At least in terms of what I can glean from the catalog scans, my faith in Lego is being renewed (provided that there are not as many BURPS in the new sets; however, I fear that there are in the Arctic line.) I don't expect to purchase (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitly a one man cockpit was(Re: Shoddy MF)
|
|
Eric Kingsley <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:FKy2rL.CMB@lugnet.com... (...) MF (...) you (...) co-pilot. (...) this (...) Actually, I started to at least LDraw the exterior. I haven't gotten very far, as it is painstaking work using (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on 2000 SW
|
|
(...) You know, I would bet that this "Arctic" theme came out of development of Hoth sets for the Star Wars line. At any rate, I think it's fairly certain that we'll be seeing Hoth sets pop up in the near future. "2001: a Hoth Odyssey" -Pete (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Town construction sets
|
|
(...) Agreed. What is the purpose of having police and fire rescue sets without anyone or anything to save? What is the purpose of having construction sets when they have nothing to construct? What is the purpose of having race sets without fans to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more 2000 comments
|
|
(...) Those ones I saw, although I *think* they're dark grey, although it's hard to be sure from a catalogue pic. Go figure, lighting has a real impact on whether grey appears light or dark! And I also *think* those are 2x2x2 'minifig dress' slopes (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: JVM and spirit.ocx
|
|
(...) I don't exactly know how _much_ has been done, but I know there's been quite a bit of interest at times over the past year, and I know of at least three Java/JVM efforts related to the RCX. Here are some links which you might find useful: (3 (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: UK 2000?
|
|
(...) '98 (...) look (...) the (...) The Subbuteo sets suck. The Arctic and Dino stuff looks interesting, though... Huw (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: UK 2000?
|
|
(...) That *is* the full US catalogue. They don't get a nice think one like us. The first sightings of the large Technic sets will come in a European catalogue. If we're lucky we might see one posted on the web somewhere this side of Christmas, like (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaurs!
|
|
(...) Yes, everyone please know how foolish I feel for not mentioning Kevin Loch's heroic scanning when I posted the link. I was too excited about the dinosaurs to be rational, and the scans were all the buzz in .general at the time. So let me offer (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 sets as Parts Packs
|
|
(...) I really wonder. Why do those soccer busses have train windows, and in three colors? My only complaint: they should have train glass, which actually would be appropriate for some busses. Judging from this years 4561, the busses should have (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spare parts in 2000?
|
|
(...) The US doesn't get catalogs like that. The only way to get spare parts packs is to order them through Shop at Home. Jeff (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more 2000 comments
|
|
(...) gray. Perhaps that is the set you meant Gary? Jeff (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A note about the new SW
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Damian Garcia writes: I guess that means we can start looking for the rest of (...) I certainly hope that you are right, but just about every Wal-Mart, Target and K-Mart that I visit has plenty of Star Wars Legos stocked; I would (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
