Subject:
|
Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 21:01:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
812 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Michael Huffman writes:
> > Aren't the new castle wall sections a Bellvile piece, but in gray?
> > Aren't they a little taller than the standard wall piece...
> > like 6-8 tall vs. 5 tall classic wall piece?
>
> If you mean the tower elements from 5808 (which is Scala, not Belville) shown
> here:
> <http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/catalogs/1999/h99us-hol/h99us-hol-26.html>
No, it is Belville. TLG calls it Belville, and the 'figs are Belville Figs.
:)
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
| (...) Whups! You're right. The page before is Scala, though, and that's what I used as a reference. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! It's a moot point for me, really, since neither Belville nor Scala are available in Canada. James (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
| (...) If you mean the tower elements from 5808 (which is Scala, not Belville) shown here: (URL) then no, they aren't. The Scala piece is much larger - something like 6x6x12 (probably wrong - I haven't actually measured it), whereas the new castle (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
