 | | Re: HELP! NXT brick flash now read-only!!
|
|
Hi Nathan, (...) clever solution. I actually wondered how to do the debouncing, to get the required (in bold face!) pulse of at least 50ms. (...) :-) Jürgen (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rarest LEGO Parts from the 1950's
|
|
(...) Hi Gary, I think this (and all your other recent similar posts) would be excellent additions to your "History of LEGO" page (URL) not sure who maintains that page, but it would be good if it had links to all these posts. It would also be good (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) This is definitely wrong! There is nothing unique with the LDRAW library. It doesn't have a special place in the universe - it's just another information collection. My BlockCAD program can load *some* LDRAW model files and render a picture (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) Actually there is. Anton Raves' library comes immediately to mind. Using that you're not using any information from the LDRAW parts, only the placement information in the model file. And his is not the only library of Lego parts in the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX controlled GBC train drawbridge
|
|
(...) Ah, OK. No problem then, I was just worrying for a moment that you'd have to further modify the whole thing. (...) Cool. I have an additional 7.73 kg of AA's if we need them :-) (...) Not sure what you mean here. I was just picturing a (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Timothy Gould wrote: [snip-snap] (...) the steerco has considered the option to change the license but considering that we weren't able to track down 18 people last time (URL) (we are still 33 parts behind in the rewrite (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Straight LEGO Country Flags of 70's and 80's
|
|
(...) Manfred, My mistake, I meant to say "1592", and instead said "1589" (the 1978 Weetabix UK set). So let me ask again (correctly), were there specific companies that promoted the British (1980) and Dutch (1983) #1592 set? Thanks, Gary Istok (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX controlled GBC train drawbridge
|
|
(...) You'd need a hopper to store balls that arrive while the bridge is raised. You could probably rig a gate/door onto it that is open when the bridge is down and closed when the bridge is up. Or the entire hopper could tilt backwards with the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Rarest LEGO Parts from the 1950's
|
|
Most LEGO parts of the 1950's are relatively obscure for modern LEGO collectors. During the first half of the 1950's LEGO was only sold in Denmark (1949), Sweden (for a short time in 1950, but reintroduced in 1955), and Norway (1953). Lego started (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Hartford Hosts England's Loudest Band
|
|
You should add a Stonehenge of the appropriate size. You could make it from some binoculars: [LDrawPart 30162:7] I like the Wookies dangling money from a fishing pole. (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) Actually, exactly the point I was trying to make (you just made it shorter). If there's an economic or resource-driven reason for doing something, commercial interests do a great job. But if you want to go somewhere, trying to invent (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
I love the classic Space look. I wish I had those yellow windshield pieces. (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) don, you wouldn't have a model file at all without the parts library. at least not without extreme effort because of the missing visual feedback. I'll give you some codes: CM051P09.dat, HF300P09.dat, CM060P14.dat, CM053P03.dat, CM250P02.dat (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Straight LEGO Country Flags of 70's and 80's
|
|
(...) Hello Gerhard, Which one of the (URL) two sets with number 1589> are you refering to? :-) I guess your question concerns the set with LUGNET reference number (URL) 1589_1>, Town Square. It is just as the information in the LUGNET database says (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New inline 4 cylinder Pneumatic Engine - No valves.
|
|
(...) Very interested. I'm always on the lookout for new cam designs. The engine's very cool, although I can't quite visualize the motion. Thanks! Rick C. (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) If you are referring to the non-pursuit section of the readme it is most definitely in accord with the license. As you say a license is only as good as its enforcement but stating a policy of enforcement does not change the license. As an (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
(...) Hahaha :) The advantages of using the monorail track are that it's very, very rigid laterally (like, it can really press into it without it deflecting at all) and simple to construct. It's a wide, flat surface... the 4.5 V rails I fear will (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) I agree. The way the readme puts it is not in accord with what the license requires. Furthermore, because there is a disclaimer in readme that it is not a license, that whole bit can and should be ignored and only the license followed. If (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I agree with the ethical imperative argument. There are plenty of old laws on statute books that no-one follows or expects to follow but are still there. Either way, ethical decisions are made on an individual basis (including the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: automazione treni
|
|
(...) Il regolamento mi sembra ben articolato, anche se non troppo restrittivo (tranne che x le dimensioni e peso)..cioé dire che uno puo' mettere piu' brick programmabili é un chiaro vantaggio a chi ha piu' pezzi..io ad esempio ne ho due oltre a (...) (19 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
