 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Like, right underneath the logo-bar. How about: "This site is better than official! It's [fan created], and The LEGO Group has nothing to do with!" Steve (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
(...) I never said it was your intention to deceive. I just think the implied attitude behind "anyone with a clear understanding of English" is a little misplaced, given the fact that your eBay description is NOT crystal clear. If it were, you (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) GNU free, or just no-price? It could have been worse--it could have only run on a BeBox. Steve (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Nugator.com - New Lego Retail Super Site
|
|
(...) I think the idea is that it is a monthly fee, not yearly; hence, if you wished to get a discount on something, or just wanted to be part of a contest than ran for a month or two, you'd have to pay the $5.00 fee for that month. Also, if it is (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Last week I had a bidder with a rating of -1. That did worry me, I must admit. Then after a day or so he got some feed back, so his rating was boosted to zero. He was outbid in the end. -- Scott A Edinburgh, Scotland. (URL) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | 3011 Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
0 Duplo Brick 2 x 4 0 Name 3011.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Part 1 16 40 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 -40 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 48 0 76 0 0 (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3437 Duplo Brick 2 x 2 [DAT]
|
|
The Duplo Terror has begun! <gg> 0 Duplo Brick 2 x 2 0 Name 3437.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Element 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 48 0 36 0 0 0 -44 0 0 0 36 box5.dat 4 16 40 48 40 36 48 36 -36 48 36 -40 48 40 4 16 (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) The more I think about it, I think a simple letter would do. But first I think we should experiment a bit with different logos and present them printed on the letter so they can review them right there and state their preference. Once I get (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) On the small logos it probably would not work, so another solution would have to be devised for that. (...) I'd prefer to keep it red. I don't think a wireframe fade would be considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose. (...) I (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
(...) So am I...to a point...$40 for empty boxes...I'd start having my doubts. Unfortunately, I've been left hanging more than a few times by those with no feedback. Good luck to you. Julie He/she is (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Well, if we were to contact TLG, what would be the best approach to it, to get on their good side? I'm not totally objected to contacting them, I just would like to make sure we've done everything we can to have them not jump on us beforehand. (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Box Progress
|
|
(...) The only reason I thought each box should have a received/log/mailed thread of its own was to help Tamy. I know she's back at school and I thought it would be less time consuming for her to check to see who wants to be added if we keep the (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Also for the record, Scott had appended his eBay posting to explicitly state the boxes are empty *before* anyone here pointed out the possibly misleading description. And Scott, sorry if my first contribution to this thread sounded accusatory - I (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Expo at The Toy Connection
|
|
(...) LOL :) I actually haven't bought too much Lego from the store in the last year. I acquired about 2000 bricks from a garage sale, got the X-Wing in Carlsbad, and got some insectoids set for my birthday (belated). That's it! (...) Hehe... well, (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.il.chi)
|
| |
| | Re: Test Box to show update format - RECEIVED
|
|
(...) I got the box - isn't this internet shipping fast?? The Professor (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Test Box to show update format - SEND
|
|
(...) OK - I'm sending it to the professor I added lots of stuff. Tim (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Personally I didn't think twice about the Adequate.com red brick on the button. 1) I don't see it around that often and 2) to me the red 2x2 doesn't represent TLG (but to some it may). (...) Thanks :) Uhm, the 6982 was intended to be a (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Test Box to show update format
|
|
(...) I've received the box - lots of great stuff in here!! I'll send it to the Professor on Sunday Tim T. (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Test Box to show update format
|
|
(...) I'm in on this.... Professor Lego Department of Lego Studies Univ of Legoland Legoland Denmark A1234 (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | RE: X10 X-Cam
|
|
Don't buy the X-10 system expecting to use it for robotics. Those 2.4Ghz transmitters are directional and therefore are not well suited for the robotics application. Go to Best Buy or shopping.com etc. and buy a 900Mhz transmitter/receiver (actually (...) (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
