 | | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Yes, and we have a fix. LPub automatically centers the 3D model about the origin. ldglite draws the origin at 2/3 of the way down the window, so it ends up rendering it partially off screen. You can manually work around this by using the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My MOCs: large scale jets, cars, and trucks
|
|
(...) Thanks for the comments. That my MOCs would look good in Legoland is a major compliment. One of my inspirations were the pictures in the Ultimate LEGO book, and apparently that shows. I admire people for the creativity and often humour that (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: ISCC entry by Michael Jasper
|
|
(...) Which is why I'm glad .trains finally got a co-curator... the original curator was SUCH a slacker! Glad someone's doing stuff! (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Blazingly fast indeed... But I can't get it render complete images: (URL) (LPub 2.3.0.6, LdGLite 1.1.6, Windows 2000). Any hint? TIA, Philo (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
(...) [...] (...) OH WOW!!! Wouldn't that be totally cool?! Like, there -are- those underground caverns with drops of thousands of feet, right?! hoh - that's way creeper than those silly train bridges ;-) And there ARE underground rivers. OOooo! And (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground)
|
| |
| | Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Gary Quinlan wrote: (snip) See also this (completely unscientific, but interesting) poll: (URL) number 3 means it was set up *quite* a while ago, back when polling was first unveiled on LUGNET. It's gotten 200 votes so far and the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: ISCC entry by Michael Jasper
|
|
(...) which is why I added it to the sidebar a coupla days ago! I was going to add it last week but I was waiitng for a story to go with the Brickshelf images. It is cool isn't it? Tim (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: newsgroup
|
|
(...) Cerchi questi: (URL) non fai esplicita richiesta, essi non vengono mai cancellati. Saluti, Luca (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: My MOCs: large scale jets, cars, and trucks
|
|
(...) Well, I'll go ahead and say something - I really like your models! Lugnet often seems to prefer original creations, but I've always enjoyed modeling real-life vehicles like you've done, and done very well. You've quietly used a lot of advanced (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: ISCC entry by Michael Jasper
|
|
(...) Wow. I plowed through it in the original German, then babelized it for good measure, and it appears to be a retelling of part of Gulliver's travels, set in a railway millieu. VERY well done. (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
(...) Har har Tim (Mind you, you lose the pun when you change group to o-t.pun!) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Is this actually true? I think you need to compare to LGB, Lionel, or quality HO or N gear rather than comparing to Bachman or Tyco stuff (or the equivalent low quality Oz brands). In that case LEGO stuff is cheaper. At least the starter sets (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: push trains (was Re: 12V to 9V - why the switch)
|
|
(...) Yes exactly like 7715, which was the only set I could afford as a kid, but with the advantage that you wouldn't need to buy electrical rails to electrify it tim (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | push trains (was Re: 12V to 9V - why the switch)
|
|
(...) I think that producing a line of unpowered trains would be a GREAT move for TLC. Basicly, sell train sets that are pretty much the same as they are now but without the motor/speed regulator/etc. Include a circle or oval of track plus a (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Riley wrote: <snip> (...) They are in the new greys--I bought the Harry Potter motorized Hogwarts package--the track that come in the Hogwarts box are the new dark grey. The funny thing is I bought the 'big package' from (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) The big question is, why arent LEGO trains available on the retail shelves? I suspect part of it is because LEGO trains as a rule are expensive. Expensive compared to other LEGO sets (due to the cost of the electrics) And more to the point, (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Yeah, I can never remember how to attach gdb to a running process, so that one isn't in my usual bag of tricks. I'll have to try harder to remember it next time. Fortunately for me, Kevin already found the bug in lpub. :^) Don (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Australia is definitely not the unique case, but more likely the typical case. In the US, most consumers can only buy Lego trains online or from S@H. During the holiday shopping season, TRU may carry trains, but other than that, trains are (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
I've snipped all the rest away because I agree with it, close enough, and I want to focus on one thing... (...) THe following is my view but I believe it's pretty widely shared. LUGNET is (especially when it's working right) a meritocracy. You get (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote: I just timed rendering of all the pedmatic construction step images and part list images and the process took less than 3 minutes! Amazing. After I debug ldglite and ldview on windows 98, then I'll work on the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
