 | | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) I think that certainly helps, but I'd be interested in your sources. Mine are just what I vaguely remember from articles in TRAINS magazine all these years (coming up on my 35th anniversary as a subscriber)... (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Ummm guys, if you're gonna keep going down this thread, you might wanna take it to o-t.fun or somewhere - I think it's been way off topic for trains for quite a while now... ROSCO (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Hmmm, just maybe I'm clever enough to hang out in CSF......nah! :-) JOHN (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | TexLUG Austin meeting Sunday 5/8
|
|
Folks, Come on by the next Austin TexLUG meeting this coming Sunday. (And yes, it *is* on Mother's Day. Show your Mom you love her by getting out of the house for a couple hours!) Particulars are below. If you have a creation to show, bring it. We (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.org.us.texlug, lugnet.loc.us.tx.aus, lugnet.loc.us.tx)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) It has always been my understanding that the FIRST reason for shared trucks is to reduce Rolling Resistance. Fewer wheels means less rolling resistance. But, I could be wrong on this. . (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Ah yes, the blind leading the blind. You two make quite the pair. Charming, really. Now run along. The grownups have important stuff to talk about. :-) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Actually, Kevoh nailed it. You've been had. JOHN (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: txt2dat - Create LDraw files from text
|
|
(...) That's odd. I always set explorer that way myself, but I have the same desktop.ini file and the same behavior in the fonts directory on both XP and 95. Apparently you can modify all sorts of folder behavior with these magic options in (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Ya, every time someone trashes Jake for not looking out for us, I remember that set. Pretty slick move. So slick, I'm willing to forgive Jake for finagling his own minifig. (URL) or (URL) WHO can POSSIBLY say that isn't a minifig Jake??? (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Stick to that line of thought, Kevoh... it might even work for you, over with the spacers. (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SWATBot
|
|
(...) OMG, I'll say. That's cool Tony. Crossposted to .mecha. (I'll update the sidebar too.) That's pretty hip, I'm mostly impressed by the fact you got two levers that'll hold the bot up. More impressed that the levers hold all the weight. Cool. (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Seibert wrote: <snip> (...) Actually, Jake already delivered on this request, although in a sneaky way. It was Jake who (strongly?) suggested to the set designers that set #7045, Hovercraft Hideout (URL) would greatly benefit (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) No, I think his move was a good one. The classic "I know I made a mistake, but through word play I will make it seem like you are the one with the mistake" You just didn't get the joke. ~Kevoh what's this thread even about? some new train? (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Nice try there, J2... Well played, in fact, but no. You lose. (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Buildings with 4 Walls
|
|
(...) I would guess that it isn't the AFOL's that would disparage the "doll house" comparison, but I bet the 8-10 year old boys might have a problem with it. (...) Those lucky enough to live near a pick-a-brick location know that 1x4x3's aren't that (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Might not have occurred to you that I was kidding; perhaps a bit too subtle. Sorry for any confusion on your end:-) JOHN (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Glad I wasn't the only one who noticed those... I think the part in question is this (URL) one>. Which unfortunately was only shipped in one set (the rather rare 3800). It would be very nice if those were available at PaB. It would be great if (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) This is what is called pointing out that YOU were wrong, within the framework of apology. Sorry if it was a bit too subtle for you! How about this?? "You're wrong! Twice in one thread tree, no less!" (some snippage) (...) Ya, that pretty much (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | GBC module screw and stepper
|
|
Hi, Both of my modules are complete. You can find pictures at (URL) thanks to philo a movie at (URL) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Marginally, yes. But much more important is the significant reduction in tare(1) weight, and the reduction in length. Since TOFC/COFC(2) is operated at high speeds, in long trains, less tare means more payload per horsepower used, and less (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
