 | | Re: 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
(...) I have one of those motors and a coupl eof the 4.5V battery boxes, I just can't imagine trying to control a two motor chassis in this way. (mental image of me with a battery box in each hand and a thumb on each of the forward/reverse levers) (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Yes, and about many other things too. Look what I found in the "Press" section of the Lego website. (URL) For those too lazy to click, here's the text: Classic Grey LEGO bricks on sale again In very early April 2005 the LEGO Group will (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.fun.holiday, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
(...) Well, that's a 4.5v motor. They had a battery box that ran the motors. (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car?
|
|
Does anyone have more infomation/plans for 1038 ERBIE the Robo-Car? I fond the refence while searching Peeron, and jumped to the Lugnet Guide entry here: (URL) looks like it build some sort of dual drive chassis, but I can't imagine what powered (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: From beautiful downtown Burbank . . .
|
|
(...) Nice work Bruce!! Cyndi (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.town, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Maybe the phrase "a place where most English-speaking communities connect" would be a more accurate term for LUGNET, since "center" does imply the other communities would orbit around LUGNET, which I don't think is accurate. So thanks for (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A query to GBC members, module builders, and technic model builders.
|
|
(...) I use the Technic chain to take the backlash out of gear trains, and to create gear trains in combinations that are not possible using only gears (due to spacing of the gears on beams etc.) Where one chain is not strong enough, clever designs (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | MOCs
|
|
Hi all, This is the first time I actually post MOCs. You can see two at (URL) admit the web site is not very active and I have only photographed a few MOCs. I will add an other model as soonas possible (I have photoes). Currently i am working on a (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.people.teens)
|
| |
| | Re: teen FOLs: do we actually exist?
|
|
(...) for me it's more like: "so, WHEN will you clear up your room??" "I did so just this morning." "No you did not, I can see that without even entering your room!" "Well, I just started to build this cool car..." (...) considering that I have (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.people.teens)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) Calum, I agree that there potentially *could* be some loss of support to the AFOLs from TLC. That's hard to predict, but... presumably as often is said, TLC is business. Presumably, the support/attention the AFOLs get form them is viewed as a (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Larry's statement would be my personal take of the situation, given all the observable facts, and without knowing exactly what happened behind boardroom doors. Dave K -not that I want this to escalate into a debate. (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Dillution of trade name
|
|
Dear LEGO, While shopping yesterday in a relatively new US WalMart store, I noted that the various sections of the toy department have little banner signs hanging out from the top of the stock shelves. These seemed to be placed in such a way so that (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Vision Command
|
|
Ieri sera, dopo rocambolesche operazioni, ho installato il Vision Command su XP (per info (URL) risolvendo anche lo stupido conflitto della patch tra la directory "programmi" di xp ita rispetto a "program files" della versione inglese (se interessa (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Propellor 3 Blade with 24t Gear Complete Assembly - 2740c01
|
|
Well, I've done a request for this part more than a year ago, but to no avail.... Since I'm an airplanefreak I would really like to use it in some MOC's So if anyone is working on it or is planning to do so, please let us know! (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My First GBC
|
|
(...) I'd say that's a really good start. Many of the modules I've seen have places where the balls get stuck. Considering the number of balls running through the contraption, it's not really a big deal. Steve (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) Wow!!! I am utterly impressed. It is as if a responsible adult has come into a chaotic room full of squabbling children and restored order, reason and common sense. Everyone leaves happy. What would make me even more impressed? If the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Some fun for Buffy and Angel fans
|
|
(...) Verklempt? Did you learn that from Giles? ;-) (...) Yup, need to be done. (...) No arguement there ;-) (...) Let's not leave out Harmony now... or have you done her alrady? (...) ..... and therefore Lindsay (then might as well do all of (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
|
(...) If I MUST program a state machine, I could program it to be a small array. Something like this: if(i==0) r=array0; if(i==1) r=array1; if(i==2) r=array2; etc... Self modifying code would be more elegant, but can that be done? If it can be done, (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
|
(...) You CAN program it, or use the state machine structure provided by LEGO (...) You also can use NQC, but I don't know the extent of what's available on the Spybot. There are differences between the RCX and the Spybot. (...) Yes, perfect. But it (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
|
(...) I'm not sure that's necessarily a valid conclusion. Another possible conclusion is that you were wrong, but LEGO is such a good company at heart that they apologised anyway in the interests of peace and harmony. (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
