Subject:
|
Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:53:33 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
5832 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Burkhard Schloemer wrote:
> To me it also proves that our DOC (Department Of Complainers) here at Lugnet
> (and especially the Germans) couldn't have been that wrong on the issue. Let me
> tell all you counter-complainers straight away:
>
> WE WERE RIGHT.
I'm not sure that's necessarily a valid conclusion. Another possible conclusion
is that you were wrong, but LEGO is such a good company at heart that they
apologised anyway in the interests of peace and harmony.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
| (...) Larry's statement would be my personal take of the situation, given all the observable facts, and without knowing exactly what happened behind boardroom doors. Dave K -not that I want this to escalate into a debate. (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
| Not bad at all! I suppose this is as good as it can possibly get. However, this statement should have been made a bit earlier. How long could it take to come up with a press release like that? Or was the general idea to let the dust settle a bit (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
