Subject:
|
Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 05:06:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5705 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, Burkhard Schloemer wrote:
> > To me it also proves that our DOC (Department Of Complainers) here at Lugnet
> > (and especially the Germans) couldn't have been that wrong on the issue. Let me
> > tell all you counter-complainers straight away:
> >
> > WE WERE RIGHT.
>
> I dunno if it was so much a question of being right or not-- I think the
> difference of opinion was "is this a big deal" or not. There was some
> disagreement about whether or not they made any "promise" to us that they broke
> in re-releasing the Maersk blue again, but I know the contention was that Lego
> didn't legally HAVE to do anything. Whether or not they SHOULD was another
> matter, as well as whether or not our enthusiasm for the product would diminish
> if they didn't.
>
> Personally, I'm glad they apologized and made the offer to buy back Maersk ships
> (although if we hear that that offer hurts the company significantly, I'll be a
> lot less glad), but I didn't think it was a huge deal if they didn't do
> anything.
>
> DaveE
I think its an easy thing to offer to buy back the sets, since absolutely no-one
will be giving them back! :) I sure won't.
-Alfred
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Final Official Statement - Maersk Second Run
|
| (...) I dunno if it was so much a question of being right or not-- I think the difference of opinion was "is this a big deal" or not. There was some disagreement about whether or not they made any "promise" to us that they broke in re-releasing the (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
