To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *489823 (-40)
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Pft. He's just using Pico to edit the mail. He might be using a same mailer, like mutt. All the cool kids use mutt! :) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: ... Calum, just wanted to say that I completely agree. Your post actually made me fire up a browser, find your post in the web interface, log in, go back to the post, and spotlight it. That's how much (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Give it up Gil. all your members belong to US now. (screams) RTL!!! um no wait. maybe thats WHY people now hang out here. actually there are about a MILLION reasons people like RTL. just off the top of my head: Elitist, pretentious, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  SHHHH! That was supposed to be secret... (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company blah blah blah blah)
 
(...) Now you did it..... you posted the secret message about the secret stash of grey bricks..... -Rob A> (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Bwahahahaha! I wonder if I should write an open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company asking him to burn this letter you are sending and this whole color issue so Lugnet once more can be about creativity. Who'd sign that? I left this place about a (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Drop by .space or CSF, Joe...we miss you. ;) -Gil (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) And we also have a letter of support. Some AFOLs think it's the worst decision LEGO has ever made, while others support LEGO and their right to make decisions about their own products, even if they disagree with them. (...) If opinions are (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)  
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) We look forward to seeing you there... (...) E-mail me your address. (...) I really like to build my stuff with a very clean look. That usually means hiding all the inner workings. That's why the stairs looked like this in my first build: (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Well Stefan, I try to do my best to come up with alternate models my own because often I'm not really impressed by the official ones. So if you say that the LEGO designers need to work harder I won't disagree with that... ;-) Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) I'm glad you've enjoyed it! Hopefully the models inspire people and make them enthusiastic. I hope too some designers will notice them. ;-) Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Thanks Allen, It seems this creation got some attention and actually I'm a bit surprised. I didn't expect this to happen on a community where I see so many fabulous work of true LEGO artists. To stick with a limited parts selection is indeed (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Thanks Thomas, In my opinion my models just show some of the many possiblities what could be made with a designerset. They're mainly to stimulate people to build MOCs, that's probably why LEGO called them designersets. ;-) But if it will (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Too good??! There's always space for improvements, but I just do my best Paul. Hmm interesting thought that TLC consults with me on the parts selection. Would be nice ofcourse... :-D But if this would be the case it's not completely fair to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Dinner Discussion Followup: Ropeway Technology
 
-Brekenridge Resort, CO. Lift: Snowflake. This is the one with the crazy 45 degree turn I was mentioning (URL) grips: Here are some technical related items about detachable grips. (URL) This is a great document from POMA talking a little bit about (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Civil War!
 
In lugnet.color, Richard Noeckel wrote: [snip - just go back and read it] Alright! At last, some clear sense in this morasse! My legions of Bionicle mutant toa heroes stand ready for battle! They are through with being put down. Their patience is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) Wow, nearly untouched territory... pumping Steve's... oh, never mind. On a more pratical note, does your pump meet the height requirement for the GBC? I've got two ball pumps working, but both have the same problem - allowing room under the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
 
  Re: My open letter.. to the WORLD
 
Hello! (...) Agreed. Though I don't own any. They only come in sets that come with new greys and brown, which I don't buy. Bye Jojo (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: Johnny five IS alive - first MOC
 
bricksnap wrote: > Yes, treads are working, but moving is rather bumpy. Because of the construction > of the treads and the huge overall weight they easily broke up. I'm a little suprised that you chose to use just one motor for each tread. The (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Thanks a lot, guys, you've made me hate LUGNET.
 
Hey Jeremiah, As Steve noted, it's pretty easy to stay away from the real acrimonious threads. I pretty much stick to reading specific theme forums. Things aren't really that bad. Look at the posts that are spotlighted right now: 8 are highlighting (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Thanks a lot, guys, you've made me hate LUGNET.
 
(...) Here here... Although I plan on hanging around and having a look in on LUGNET every so often, I have to agree with you about the mood shift seen over the last year or so. I too like to come here to see others ideas and MOCS. But this constant (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Legoköp på nätet.
 
Hur mycket beställde du för, om man får fråga? Aldrig hört talats om någon som handlat för mindre än 500,- som fått betala moms, tull och avgift. Runt tusenlappen tycks det vara ungefär 50/50 som "slipper" undan. Det där med flera personer i samma (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.se)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Peter Howkins (26), London, United Kingdom, 200ukp in 2003, 50ukp in 2004 (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Thanks a lot, guys, you've made me hate LUGNET.
 
(...) Jeremiah, while I would intend to agree with you on many of your points, I can make at least two suggestions. First: Stop reading all the posts that pertain to the color change. I did, and I am much happier. Second: Start over with (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
How pathetic. And not even funny. What’s the point beside showing you’ve already earned a master degree in sucking up? Here we have a petition, Ben’s letter, an attempt to use the growing influence of AFOLs in order to improve our hobby and to help (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: 10152 Update
 
In lugnet.lego, Jake McKee wrote: ... (...) ... (...) Okay LEGO, Now the cat's out of the bag. How much do we have to chip in for two train car hopper loads of Classic Grey and Dark Grey ABS? Ed (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) 1st, Funny how you can't spell out masterbate & masterbation - IT'S NOT EVEN A SLANG WORD! 2nd, I still see no facts (only opinion) that Ben is a wank. -Patrick (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) Please try to refrain from name calling and personal attacks when formulating your responses. To quote a previous post I made: "A little more civility and politeness and a little less vitriol go a long way to having people respect your opinion (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Holiday houses
 
(...) I can browse the archive of the forum, but it seems that the messages I wrote have disappeared! I remember I wrote a message November 2003 (Rubik cube) and a second message a couple of months ago (holiday house search), but I can't find them (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.de)
 
  [FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group] Les nouveautés mercredi 19 janvier 2005
 
Bonjour Voici la lettre d'information du site "FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group" ((URL) lettre recense les articles et les brèves publiés depuis 1 jours. Nouveaux articles ---...--- ** Pourquoi j'écris ! ** par Didier ENJARY le 19 (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.fr.freelug)
 
  Re: January Lugola meeting postponed
 
(...) He's been trying to get this problem resolved for more than a year now. Any attempts to post result in an additional verification step requiring email. Admins have tried to help, but not successfully. Hopefully we can get this cleared up soon (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.us.lugola)
 
  Re: AFOL Mindstorm competition in Billund
 
(...) we (FreeLUG : French LUG) are planning on going. We need to know exactly who will go in FreeLUG, but it is almost sure to be present. see you at this competition :-) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
 
(...) I haven't forgotten about you either Tim! Just wanted to let you know I care (that, and whence next our paths cross, I shall gladly treat you to some goodies from Panera :-D). Pumpkin muffins...*droooool* (...) I agree! It's just now there's (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO.....was (Re: Ugh...)
 
(...) [snipped a bunch] rtl gang, Hi there. I just wanted to say that I found this post and related replies to be a much-needed good laugh. So merci beaucoup (yes, i realize that if you live in Canada you don't necessarily speak French; it just (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) WOW! This is the first I've seen of your 'designer alternates' and so I've just spent a highly enjoyable jaunt through your Brickshelf folders. Fabulous work which shows just what Lego is all about - I hope some of the designer set design (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) I just wanted my message to be seen by the people who saw his message. I didn't want to just reply to it, because it would be lost among all the other replies. Crossposting the same way he did seemed the only other option. If you can suggest (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) Was that changed back because of a letter to the CEO sent by a member of LUGNET? I'm sorry I must have missed that one. Yeah, changing DUPLO was a mistake, and they changed it back. But that was the kind of mistake that affects their core (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) I'm not brown-nosing. I'm just disgusted with the way some so-called Adult fans of LEGO act like three-year-olds when the company makes a change they don't agree with. (...) Yeah, they're a company that needs to focus on its core business - (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) The only message Ben is sending is that he is a WHINER. LEGO knows that AFOL's are not its main customers, and whatever changes they make or don't make have nothing to do with what AFOL's want. Messages like this just make AFOL's look like (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  4589 cingolato
 
In attesa di lanciarmi in un ambizioso progetto sulle orme del mitico Philo, ieri sera mi sono molto divertito ... Il 4589 è un set veramente simpatico, ma alcuni suoi aspetti lo rendono un bel po' limitato: 1. la parte inferiore non ha alcun punto (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)

Skipped 2 messages in groups lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.test (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR