 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure that the 10152 wasn't either. This whole thing seems to turn on a mistranslation more than anything else. That's pretty funny at one level, actually. Most of the rest of the difference appears to be cultural, we seem to have a (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SSClagorpion - Status Report
|
|
(...) Aye it shall, even if I have to throw large amounts of $ at Lego to get the parts to do so.. it shall! It seems my Lego collection is too eclectic to have enough to finish it right now.. but I'm working on one... (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Space Wagon
|
|
(...) box of classic space sets, and I can really appreciate the way you've updated 918 since I'm rebuilding the original. I really like the engine, with the vectoring finger things, and the trunk is cool. The color scheme is grat, too. Plus, you (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
(...) It's really cold outside. I think hell is freezing over. I just ventured out from the .robotics room and read the 10152 thread. I agree with BOTH Larry AND Calum. I better get my coat. Steve (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update: What has TLC to do to bring YOU up against them?
|
|
(...) Wrong. TLC stated that they had old Maersk Blue pellets and 'wouldn't it be nice to give the AFOL a really cool set and use up the pellets at the same time'. Why should that negate future contracts? It was a business decision made at the time (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure the duck wasn't marketed as a "limited edition of 10,000". It really matters not what their excuss is if they changed their mind they could have changed the model. Their move was compleatly unethical and problably leaves them (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
(...) Well put Calum.... I feel the same way. Personally, all I ever read nowadays is rtlToronto, loc.ca, and technic sub-groups. Everytime I have ventured into the main group, and scanned some of the topics (the great dumb grey debate, people (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Builder ?
|
|
(...) Yes, I am watching ! I don't think you can rely on anything to positively identify an unofficial part. We could enforce something in all files that are submitted to the Parts Tracker, but unofficial files could just be local to the user, with (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | RE: Problem with the new robolab2.5.4
|
|
Sorry, I think I need to clarify further... - This is in the "Investigator" section, NOT the regular program area. - after I click on the big "upload" arrow, I changed the dataset name to, e.g., "ds1", but there is no graph. - I click on the "upload (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
You know, in my random stumblings among the leftovers from a nice community it's nice to find rtlToronto and Calums wise words once more. Perhaps one day I'll be back sharing the fun in full scale. This should provide som interesting responces from (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
