 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) I have to admit, my LEGO CAD experience is limited to a single program. I picked what appeared to be the most popular and best supported, and dove in. Way too user-unfriendly, IMHO, so I didn't bother to check out what seemed to be the bit (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Wishful Thinking of AFOL
|
|
Lawrence, I prefer to look at the current selection of bulk bricks in a positive light. For one thing, the program has only been in place for a few months. Give Lego a chance to work with the feedback from the community and expand the program. I'm (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A few of my SW MOCS
|
|
Since I haven't seen the Shuttle or AT-ST yet, other than the pics, I can't comment too much. But the AT-ST looks much better than the official one I think. Also, is the Shuttle actually white??? The Lego version, I mean, I thought it was grey? And (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | What's Left? (Classic)
|
|
I was just thinking about the SW sets we've seen so far from the Classic Trilogy, and I was realising that TLC is almost out of major vehicles! Forget speculation about what they *might* do next, what's left to do? *TIE Interceptor *TIE Bomber I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A few of my SW MOCS
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) The AT-ST is quite swell, I'm fairly impressed. I like the Falcon and the Shuttle too, but I think the best of the bunch is the AT-ST. The Falcon retains the overall "feel" of the Lego set, but looks much better. I don't have the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Wishful Thinking of AFOL
|
|
In lugnet.general, Lawrence Wilkes writes: <snippage> (...) <more snippage> If 'any' brick were to include the subset of red castle wall pieces with tudor decorative printing, then I think we are getting somewhere. Somehow I suspect it will not tho. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 18-inch Lego Minifigures
|
|
(...) Would that be the one in the Natick Mall, or is there another LEGO booth around somewhere? J (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) Well, the data format is a bit arcane but I'm not sure I'd characterise MLCad (to pick my favorite) as "antiquated"... it's pretty slick. But that's just my opinion, of course. It's been years since I last played with AutoCAD. I'd ask this, is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) Because some of use aren't so uptight about model designs that we feel the need to "protect" them from TLC, and would actually very much *like* to have instructions for our models, without having to suffer through an anitquated home-brewed CAD (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) Ahh, yes. Another use for the scrambler. Give it the parts list you want, and have it emit a model using them to upload to TLC to place your order. If TLC is smart, they will have the input be a parts list, and then tell us how to upload just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
