 | | Re: #9 Shell sets making appearances.
|
|
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:03:20 GMT, Jon D Hayward uttered the following profundities... (...) Both of the ones I went to didn't seem to mind how many were purchased, however, I had always purchased petrol anyway! What was painful was the one with 3p (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Are there any Soccer sets still out there?
|
|
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:56:18 GMT, Steve Anderson uttered the following profundities... (...) Would you? (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Shell promotion is over - what happens to the stock???
|
|
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:34:51 GMT, Jon D Hayward uttered the following profundities... (...) I was going to post about the end of the promo, too. However, I was lucky and caught the manager, who got the 2 little sets that I wanted. Looking forward to (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: RcxCC Joystick controls
|
|
(...) comes (...) When you say "mount it on top of the IR sensor", where and what position are you referring to. I just wnet out and bought 2 of the little carts that come with the "dome" and I was wondering how you mounted the "dome"? Thank You, (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: FOTW? Nebuala Outpost 6899
|
|
(...) I got them at Wal-Mart. You can too, if you look hard enough and are lucky enough. That is the best (percentage-wise) clearance price I've gotten in over 2 years of constant diligence, though. Patience and diligence pay off in the end. Lots of (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Using a standard remote control with the RCX
|
|
I'm not recording anything from the tower. I'm recording the message as sent by the RCX. That's nine bytes, if I remember the RCX packet format correctly. I suppose it's possible that the remote can't learn sequences that long, but I hope not. :) I (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using a standard remote control with the RCX
|
|
=>From: Eric Eilebrecht <ericeil@microsoft.com> =>... =>Has anyone gotten a "learning" remote control to work with the RCX? =>[...] => =>There are, of course, several things that could be going wrong here. The =>remote could be broken (but it works (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 sensors = 8 inputs?!
|
|
(...) Yes, but using a lever based approach gives a "pure Lego" solution to the problem, which appeals to the Lego purists out there :-) Me personally, I would use the electronic approach you outlined in your email. Regards, Mark. -- Did you check (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Using a standard remote control with the RCX
|
|
Has anyone gotten a "learning" remote control to work with the RCX? I'm refering to the type of remote that is capable of learning commands from existing remotes. I recently purchased on of these from Radio Shack, and tried to teach it to send IR (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Transmission Range when bounced off of Ceiling...
|
|
Hi David, I am working on a self learning robot using a neural brain, which should be finished in a week or so. In the mean time I have a page on my website describing how to setup a neural brain on a PC. Perhaps that's any help to you. You may also (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Transmission Range when bounced off of Ceiling...
|
|
Hi David, I am working on a self learning robot using a neural brain, which should be finished in a week or so. In the mean time I have a page on my website describing how to setup a neural brain on a PC. Perhaps that's any help to you. You may also (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Help With Programming
|
|
I have several examples of VB5 sources on my website for you to check out. CU Bert Visit my site on Lego, Robot's and Visual Basic at (URL) bericht----- Van: Charles Lundy <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com> Aan: lego-robotics@crynwr.com (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: FOTW? Nebuala Outpost 6899
|
|
(...) Call me a sucker if you're just joking about this, but where would one find a deal like that? (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Railroad 2-man pushcar?
|
|
Yes, to my wife's chagrin, the bug is bad... Thanks for the tips... Bryan John Neal wrote in message <3696499C.52A62C31@u...st.net>... (...) ! (...) creative (...) up (...) Lego (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Transmission Range when bounced off of Ceiling...
|
|
(...) The CyberMaster can't check the tower, only the tower (PC) can check and give orders to the CyberMaster. Here's a mail I've sent to Peter Ljungstrand a few days ago that explained in detail what I've done with the CyberMaster. It's a bit (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MSP Fest?
|
|
what are you planning to do with YOUR 1X1 red recessed sidestud bricks? (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.loc.us.mn.msp, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Railroad 2-man pushcar?
|
|
Sounds like you got the bug bad, Bryan...excellent! (spoken like Mr.Burns) ! My suggestion would be to go the PNLTC's website and, when you've finished drooling, start clicking on links for ideas- these guys are way more creative than TLG has (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigning my site...
|
|
(...) one day. It makes more sense than the current mixture of time, space and purpose. Play well, Jacob PS: I can't stand frames. Can't you get a similar look without the problems you get from frames? ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigning my site...
|
|
(...) Only the source. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: Jacob.Sparre.Andersen@risoe.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LEGO: MOC+++c TO+++(6543) TC+++(8880) AQ+++ BV-- #++ S LS++ A-/+ YB72m (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Best way to write the registered trademark symbol in HTML?
|
|
(...) I looked it up. It's on position 8482 (decimal) in Unicode. Play well, Jacob PS: I was wrong about Netscape. The newest version handles both ™ and ™ as a trademark symbol. - But it is approximately three times larger than ® in the (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
