| |
Mladen Pejic at mladenpejic@sympatico.ca wrote:
> "useless throwbot arms"
>
> That's exactly what Dave was saying not to do. Why destroy a piece when you
> can
> work around it? I didn't have to chop off any pieces from my Bionicle
> ball-joint arms; I incorporated them into the design. Isn't that the true
> spirit of LEGO, otherwise wouldn't we start modifying ever piece that causes
> us
> frustration.
I didn't chop up the regular ball-joint limbs, just the useless Throwbot
Throwing arm (the one that fires the disc)
If you know how to "work around" those, I'd sure like to see some ideas,
because there's no studs or technic holes or nothin'.
~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post
|
| (...) Don't feel bad, Mark. I do it too. It's the one Lego piece that shouldn't exist, but I believe it gave birth to the part we both love-the Bionicle ball with axlehole. I know you had used this part, that's why I didn't mention it in the first (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO in Washington Post
|
| (...) well (...) "useless throwbot arms" That's exactly what Dave was saying not to do. Why destroy a piece when you can work around it? I didn't have to chop off any pieces from my Bionicle ball-joint arms; I incorporated them into the design. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
