| |
In lugnet.space, Theodore Sammis II wrote:
| |
While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as
‘conventional’, my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional?
I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I’ve been wondering if
my latest bird was *too* far
out to classify as Crimson Skies...
|
I don’t think it’s the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as
much as it’s the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large
primitive looking machine guns and I think you’d be a lot closer to the CS
style... making the front canards a bit more squarish would probably also make
it look less futuristic.
-Grand Admiral
.space Curator
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Crimson Skies
|
| (...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
