| |
In lugnet.space, Andrew Engstrom wrote:
| |
For example, the Coyote, Brigand, and Dust Devil are all conventionally
|
Not really. I don’t think you understand what I was trying to point out.
Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward,
with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane
dating from WW1 to the present.
The Coyote is a fighter-sized pusher prop flying wing, with wingtip verticals.
There’s nothing conventional about that.
The Brigand has the usual large forward wings, but has no conventional tail
design.
I can’t find any pics of the Dust Devil online, but I hope you understand the
point I was trying to make.
-Grand Admiral
.space Curator
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Crimson Skies
|
| (...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
| (...) Wow, the GA himself! Still posting from the barrel in your cell? Thanks for the reply. But I think I'd disagree on that point--many of the planes in the game are just regular planes (I bought the game to see what all the hype was about). For (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
