To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 452
451  |  453
Subject: 
Re: RCX controlled GBC train drawbridge
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:52:15 GMT
Viewed: 
80 times
  
At 12:04 PM 2/7/07, Peter Ehrlich wrote:
Heres a thought.  Just have the slope going in the other
direction.  That way when it lifts, the balls keep rolling the same
direction.  (Faster and efficient!)   If the raising is too bumpy,
just find a way to place a third or fourth overhead rail keeping the balls in,


One down side here, is that the "ball-lift" must be shut-off when the
bridge is raised, and the controller for the ball lift is on the
"bridge" (other) side of the opening.  But, along those lines, if
there is a bin to catch lose balls, the bridge could just lift up,
and disconnect the ramp at both ends.  Then, when the bridge is on
it's way up, balls just roll back  across the ramp to where they
started, and into a holding area...

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: RCX controlled GBC train drawbridge
 
(...) Heres a thought. Just have the slope going in the other direction. That way when it lifts, the balls keep rolling the same direction. (Faster and efficient!) If the raising is too bumpy, just find a way to place a third or fourth overhead rail (...) (17 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

10 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR