Subject:
|
Re: Bricklink frustration
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:09:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3833 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ray Sanders wrote:
> My suggestion (to the original poster) would be to contact the seller directly,
> explain the situation and see if they can come to some amicable middle-ground.
Since I posted I've been thinking about that. I doubt he'd let two rules slide,
but If I could bump up the order to $10 he might consider shipping to England.
At least we speak the same language. I've been scouring his inventory for the
type of parts I generally use and I've found quite a few.
> No gurantees, but it might be possible. BTW, did this whole thing start over a
> $10 minimum ?
A $10 minimum yes, but when you consider thats 10 times the value of the order
then it starts to matter and then theirs the principal.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bricklink frustration
|
| (...) and that is the understatement of the century. Transport costs are already a goodly portion of the gross order billing. One year I calculated that 28% of remittances were for shipping/transport. Parts (unless the part is rare/desirable/low (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
