Subject:
|
Re: Excellent rendering...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:05:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
741 times
|
| |
|
|
Wow... now that's what I'd like to see in my animations. But the render
times are just impossible. A 15 second clip would take a month rendering! I
guess I'll stay with the standard methods and stop-motion for a while.
On another note, returning to this image:
http://tubafrog.com/temp/morefigs.jpg
While I agree that they look just like real figs, the dimensions are somehow
slightly off. There's something about them that doesn't quite work. But
that's probably just me.
Stefan.
---
New film by YellowHead Studios:
Animation Class Lesson 1.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/wandrer/animationclass/animclass.avi
Right-click and Save target As...
"Anders Isaksson" <isaksson.etuna@REMOVEebox.tninet.se> schreef in bericht
news:H2uvr1.Fxx@lugnet.com...
> "Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:H2r5CJ.25A@lugnet.com...
> >
> > http://www.pobursky.com/images/7181old.png (Warning to modem users, • 259K)
> >
> > One thing though, the colors seem to be "washed out". Is there anyway • to
> > fix this?
>
> - Make sure you don't have any lights on (you've probably already done • this)
> - Play with the 'assumed_gamma' value (higher value, darker picture)
> - Lower the AMB value (if it's still greater than zero)
> - Lower the DIF value
>
> You could probably play with the 'color map' in the sky sphere too.
>
> There are probably some things that can be changed in the radiosity
> parameters, but who has the time to experiment with these?
>
> I also played with changing the reflection values in the non-transparent
> color definitions. I changed the 'reflection 0.08' to 'reflection RFL' and
> experimented with different (lower) values. Decided 0.04 was more like my
> Lego bricks.
>
> Lars Hassing, if you're reading this, can the next L3P output
>
> #declare RFL = 0.08;
> #declare TRANS_RFL = 0.2;
>
> and use these constants in the color definitions instead of having numeric
> constants in every color definition? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I only
> found those two different values.
>
> --
> Anders Isaksson, Sweden
> BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
> Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:H2r5CJ.25A@lugnet.com... (...) - Make sure you don't have any lights on (you've probably already done this) - Play with the 'assumed_gamma' value (higher value, darker (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
59 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
