LEGO Elements/Parts : 5512


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5512	5511 \| 5513

Subject:	Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:56:02 GMT
Viewed:	4975 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: > > Hi all, • [snip] > > hopefully be added > > to parts tracker soon: > > > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=105523 > > Excelent work, but most of these parts are already on the parts tracker. > For the hooks I only found two versions, but I haven't yet finished the > curved end. Hello Niels, > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x509.dat Great! I wasn't aware of this one so far and would have done it myself soon. > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x508.dat So we did double work here: I had mine drawn in late october but the upload at ldraw failed. Then I had a three weeks vacation without online access. Now I uploaded them at brickshelf to publish them. :-( > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x507.dat That would have saved me some hours of work, if I had known about your work on these (even if I think mine are more accurately done).... > http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x447.dat At least in this case I have been a few weeks faster. ;-)) I had a close look at your file and I am not sure if yours or mine is the better - they nearly look identical. Kudos to all your great work on "new" old parts! Any chances we will see the oldest type of batterybox soon? http://www.fgltc.org/bwoabs/9v_12v/9v_12v.phtml#100 And then the electronic units of 118 and 138? http://www.fgltc.org/bwoabs/9v_12v/9v_12v.phtml#139 And then I have a question about naming: why do you name the pieces totally contrary to peeron? I would not have found your parts by myself, because I would have looked after the peeron numbers. Is there any system in your x???-numbering? Kind Regards, Ben P.s.: I have one more comment on your file: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x245c01.dat I think that one never existed in real life. http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x245c02.dat All motor wheels looked like this. The set 100 type motor never appeared with spoked train wheels and the set 103 type motor never came with 4-stud-train wheels. So x245c01.dat should better be deleted.

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
(...) There is a logic to Niels' xNNN numbers and although this has been explained several times before, it probably deserves repeating. The LDraw convention for part numbers (initiated by James Jessiman) is to use 3-digit part numbers where the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

		Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
(...) have the time I need to bring it forward. (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

		Oldest battery box & electronic units of 118 and 138
(...) Although I have created mockups for the microphone and control unit for personal use. If you want to create these parts, please do. I can send you my mockups, if you like to. Niels (19 years ago, 24-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
(...) For the hooks I only found two versions, but I haven't yet finished the curved end. (URL) thanks for your historical overview of when the different types of hook couplings were used and in wich sets. Very interesting. Niels (19 years ago, 22-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search