LUGNET News : Search Results: Moulton


Search Results: Moulton

Results 1 – 20 of about 100.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Legal to sell "reverse engineered" copies of LEGO stickers?
(...) That guy who calls himself "Onideus" on BrickLink is Matthew Moulton. Enough said. Adr. (16 years ago, 25-Jul-08, to lugnet.general)

moulton
(score: 0.455)

		Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
(...) Wow. I could see maybe a few days or a week or something, because I agree that some things were said that probably shouldn't have been. But indefinitely? Do Chris and Terry really rank up there with Matthew Moulton and Richard Marchetti, who (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

moulton
(score: 0.338)

		Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating
(Speaking of sugar coating... After reading through this post again I can see that there's bits in here to offend probably every single person who reads it. What can I say? I can only advise the casual reader that if you find yourself strongly (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)

moulton
(score: 0.273)

		Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
(...) My personal feeling is that there are some unwritten rules that strongly discourage talking about a LEGO model that someone posts. I certainly have the impression that no matter how well-intentioned, if there is a single sentence in a (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)

moulton
(score: 0.273)

		Virus spam from Kim Brodie targetting LUGNET members?
Heya y'all, I don't know if this is old news or not, but a LUGNET search on "brodie" turned up 0 results. OTOH, it seems there was some discussion about 2 weeks back about a virus email hitting .space and .castle users... Anyway, for about a month (...) (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

moulton
(score: 0.273)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) Tim certainly can determine what he thinks is a quality MOC. He could have dropped the word "quality" and it would have been valid. (...) You're right, Tim doesn't have the right to determine what is allowed on Brickshelf. He DOES, however, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

moulton
(score: 0.229)

		I think we stepped in something.
G'day folks, Note 1: I decided to compose this post because of the events of late concerning Jesse Alan Long. If you don't want to read something that will make your head hurt, skip this ;] Note 2: I am not arguing with any actions that have been or (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

moulton
(score: 0.215)

		Todd, can you please deal with this
To all who read this, The post I am refering to has foul language and the link should not be followed without you being warned. Todd, Can you please address the situation of the following post: (URL) I feel extremly excessive language has been used (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)

moulton
(score: 0.215)

		Re: It is time to ban JAL.
(...) hi, To be honest, if there is anyone else who used this language, I would be all for banning them. Especially if when they were approached on the issue they tried to dodge responsibility for it and then blamed someone else, and then stated (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

moulton
(score: 0.215)

		Re: Nothing personal, but...
(...) Moulton (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

moulton
(score: 0.211)

		Re: Should resist (Was: Couldn't resist)
(...) That's neither here nor there. Simply build them. Some people will like them, some will dislike them. But that's not what I'm annoyed by... (...) Uh, yeah. Against my better judgement, which I'm having to temporarily shut down because it's (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)

moulton
(score: 0.211)

		Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
(...) While I'm not "glad" that because of Mr Moulton it isn't quite as simple to post on Lugnet as it used to be I am glad that this security measure will in all likelihood significantly dampen (and hopefully eliminate altogether) Mr Moulton's (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)

moulton
(score: 0.211)

		Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
There are some problems I have with your arguments: 1. The person who caused all of this, I believe his name was Matthew Moulton, would still be joyfully spoofing everyone the moment he found someone with this feature turned off. 2. Todd would be (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)

moulton
(score: 0.211)

		Re: Building big
I'm probably gonna get flamed a little for this but here I go. (...) computer? His ship is oviously not a render. If Kyle had created this ship in LDraw he would be God. (...) apologize (...) Ok this is a really weird comment. Others have adressed (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)

moulton
(score: 0.210)

		Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!
moulton (verb trans.): To assume another's id on LUGNET, without the permission of the user identified in the "From:" field. Neologism, just coined. (URL) (already canceled) (URL) anytime you get a chance to implement a web-based cancel facility (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

moulton
(score: 0.210)

		The Problem (was Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!)
(...) Todd, (et al) I'm worried about a technical solution to authentication problem. In fact, I'm a bit worried about whether we're solving the right problem at all. To me it seems the problem is not enforcing a ban on individuals, it's more a case (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

moulton
(score: 0.210)

		Re: New LEGO Outlet Store
(...) ```No, not a Freudian slip!``` I know my psychodynamic theories, and the id of my unconscious did not reveal any hidden subtext. Simply put, I just didn’t know who to properly spell the word! :P Sooo...ooo, what he difference between the two? (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

moulton
(score: 0.209)

		Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
(...) The Moulton flame war is on again, and when I investigated the original incident, I came to this post. The fighters look really cool, I like Mr. Wiskers and Roller, and the boxy ships look like a bunch could land on a planet and start a (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)

moulton
(score: 0.209)

		Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
Firstly, I'd like to thank Mr. Moulton for replying so candidly to my posts. -I'm obligated to make this my last conversation with you… for Lugnets sake and so that I don’t further exacerbate the situation. The reason why? Because to some degree I (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.general)

moulton
(score: 0.208)

		Re: I'm back...
(...) Hence the futility of banning/repeat-cancelling Mr Moulton. I would never defend his past actions, but I see no point in continually bringing them up. Especially when he actually has some good stuff to show off, despite the rat-baggage. Who (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

moulton
(score: 0.208)

More: Next Page >>