Subject:
|
Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 26 May 2001 05:00:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
713 times
|
| |
|
|
Firstly, I'd like to thank Mr. Moulton for replying so candidly to my posts.
-I'm obligated to make this my last conversation with you… for Lugnets sake
and so that I don’t further exacerbate the situation.
The reason why?
Because to some degree I believe that you could indeed hurt Lugnet in general.
I don’t have a problem with you, or anything you said!
But I believe it would be prudent to discontinue conversation with you.
This is not to isolate you or because I think you did anything wrong, but
the issues of double-speak and the mad-hatter bit is far to dangerous to the
community. If you turn on us, or already have? It would be detrimental.
(It seams you already have a record.)
Therefore, on these grounds and for the sake of the community, I
personally ask you to simply stop. Ask nothing more from Todd or any of us.
Just don’t touch the community. If you want to talk Lego…just e-mail me.
I'll always be open to communication. Does this sound equitable?
<EVERYBODY HIT THE IGNORE KEY. NO MORE POSTS AT ALL, EVER!>
<EVERYBODY IGNORE HIM. NO MORE POSTS TO HIM AT ALL, EVER!>
<EVERYBODY HIT THE IGNORE KEY. NO MORE POSTS AT ALL, EVER!>
Despite the fact you have a notorious Mad-Hatter background, and the fact
that you outlined your plans in your web page. A page that stated the type
of web sabotage an individual may engage in. I'd still be open to talk, but
not on Lugnet o.k.
What I do like is your ability to question the norm:
> Matt
> acting on the whim of his so called friends…
> and be apart of the dictatorship…
Fine, if you have issues with The Lego Group, or Todd (insert distopic rant
about big-brother, 1984…451…) then take it to them, but don’t subject their
fan base to the same anger!
> Matt
> here I thought I was upholding that ideal.
You are upholding an ideal, the liberty of freedom of speech, which I
support. But consequently you’ll likely impair the very principle that
justifies your basis of equitable rights.
> Matt
> all Todd has to do is reinstate my original account and all the fuss
> ends, it's that simple.
It's not that simple!
This point of contention is non-negotionable. It won’t happen!
And why would you want back in. Do you wish to contribute to a community you
no longer respect or believe possesses neo-liberal democratic values (You
did say dictatorship, didn’t you?) then this request is simply a means of
your circular argument.
Sorry Matt, but I just can’t trust you ‘here’. And I don’t think others
should either.
Talk to us via e-mail if you want! Even you said that you no longer like the
community so choose another medium! I hope this isn’t too harsh, but if you
really care and if you indeed like, or ever have liked Lugnet, please go then.
Bye,
Regrettably --==Richard==--
P.S. If were gonna do this, everybody has to show solidarity and ignore him
in unity.
And If your gonna reply, then keep it in debate or general.
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
