 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
just as Space cannot be released as (...) So this is officially confirmed? How and why could LTG release LOM then? Is inn't that considered Space legally? Eric (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
could this be someting from the moviemakers line?? no new castle.. noooooo "Matthew Teets" <matthew.teets@sciatl.com> wrote in message news:GHKAFC.6GM@lugnet.com... (...) even (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | `The Undead Rise again?
|
|
`The Undead Rise again? If we can believe what Mr. Teets asserts is true, then the Castle world will surely become much more interestin’. (...) (URL) ***A “Monsters” Theme?*** The fantasy element returns to Castle… Even if the building parts hold (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) We've already had a lot of non-JP3 dinos be released, such as Styracosaurus and Iguanodon, and the non-dinosaurs Mososaurus and Dimetrodon. :) Jeff (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I just thought of something very odd. Star Wars = No Space Harry Potter = No Castle Jurassic Park 3= New Non-JP Dinosaurs introduced ???????? (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I hope Lego makes a cool alien head like a Gran or something. That is what I am still waiting for from the Star Wars line, Cool new heads. But make it in the manner of the Gungan and Protocol Droid Heads, not the stupid Wookie and Watto "head (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I thoguht all these licenses were stupid, but these "requirements" make them intolerable! (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
He did state that while LEGO has HP they will not be releasing castle, same as with SW, but I do not think that that precludes re-releasing old established sets in the Legend and Classic lines -- Overkill is the only sure kill. SR "Jeff Stembel" (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I haven't bought any dinosaur yet. However, I am planing on buying one of the sets for parts. :-) (...) What? No new EP 1 sets? No new podracers?!?! DEAR GOD NOOO...OOO!!!!! At least there will be some new classic sets. Oh god, I hope one of (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure he said it, because I remember being very unhappy about it. Jeff (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Why did they stop making Town sets? (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Not in my mind. Maybe a few parts for castle, but that's about it. (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Sounds interesting..any more info? (...) And I hope soon. Any hope for Pirates or Town? (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Hmm, but if you were to go on the asumption that kids these days jsut aren't into building, and that today's industry is based on hype and advertising, what about the fact that there are no television commercials for Lego anymore? Surely you (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) What? I know he mentioned it with SW, but I don't remember him saying it abotu Castle, I thought people were merely speculating that. (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) FTR, Brad mentioned (at Brickfest) that Castle sets could not be released as long as Lego has the Harry Potter License, just as Space cannot be released as long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or Legends). (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
In lugnet.year.2002, John Rudy writes: <snip> (...) Roger that... They gave the info, they knew what would happen to it, no issue. Matthew, by being mysterious, is doing his source a disservice. (if it was OK for him to know and discuss, he ought to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Geez, replying to my own post...this is bad, but I needed to revisit this with some thoughts. Yeah, I agree, Harry Potter is a poor substitute for a true castle theme. Also, Star Wars is a poor substitute for a true Space line (although I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I wish I could tell you this isn't true, but I believe this to be the case. No true castle that I could ascertain. There were some new sets dealing with some type of monster theme (like vampires, werewolves, etc) They even had a werewolf head (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I'll answer the rest of this too. Yes, I've seen the robots, being a big fan of battlebots I'm only 1/2 satisfied but I realize Lego has it's own mindset on the issue so I'm okay with it. I think there is a grabber, a pusher, a "puncher" and a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
|
