To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2001Open lugnet.year.2001 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2001 / 387
386  |  388
Subject: 
Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.year.2001
Date: 
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:20:24 GMT
Viewed: 
1046 times
  
In lugnet.year.2001, Dave Schuler writes:

A movie like that really has big shoes to fill, since it's competing
against the imagination of millions (?) over 25+ years!  Anything they tried
would be bound to disappoint some viewers, I suppose, but I'm glad to hear
it wasn't too bad...

My biggest problem with it, as a D&D player (although I haven't been in a
campaign for a couple years now), was that the characters didn't act like D&D
characters.  I mean, I got a good chuckle at a couple of points imagining the
interactions between the players- and in that way, they acted like *RPG*
characters- but the scriptwriter has never played D&D (confirmed fact) and
therefore was unable to work in things that could have been cool, like a mage
running out of memorised spells, activation words, etc.

Example:  At one point, there are Beholders being used in conjuction with
footsoldiers to guard a castle.  Each Beholder has two footsoldiers patrolling
with him.  What could they possibly have been there for?  Moral support?  "Nice
one, Beholder-guy!  Now use your disintegration beam!"  Anyone who had spent
any amount of time playing D&D would know better.

eric



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
 
Nice going eric, at least you found something to laugh at. From Yahoo Movies (URL) and Dragons (2000) Critics Reviews CNN.com: Dumb & dreadful - "...so poorly executed, you start to feel like you're watching the world's most expensive script (...) (23 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
 
(...) A movie like that really has big shoes to fill, since it's competing against the imagination of millions (?) over 25+ years! Anything they tried would be bound to disappoint some viewers, I suppose, but I'm glad to hear it wasn't too bad... (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR