 | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —John Kelly III
|
| | | (...) ..snipping.. (...) Actually I was surprised that I was as open as I was with the buildings you've done. Especially since we had told you ahead of time that they would be too big. I'm not sure I'll like John1's any better. I know I'd like your (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Two points... 1) a minor point of information: (...) Can you elaborate on what playtheme vs. miniland is? Thanks. 2) a major point of philosophy It was not my intent in working this thread a bit to - stir up intra GMLTC disharmony. (what we see is (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —John Kelly III
|
| | | | | | | (...) ...snip... Mostly a way to distinguish between the difference in scale and thought between what's in a Lego mini-land display and a play theme display that they used for toy fairs and that you usually see in toys 'r' us type displays. In (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —Scott Holcomb
|
| | | | | | | (...) Let me start by saying that I apologize if it seemed as though I was attacking GMLTC or any other group. That was the furthest from my mind. I was simply trying to put forth the idea that this is supposed to be fun and from the thread so far (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —Ed McGlynn
|
| | | | | | I agree, Larry, and I support your investigation of these dynamics. Fascinating. Ed (...) (23 years ago, 17-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | (...) Uh oh! Guess I'm boring as well. I only furnish the first floor of those buildings that you can see into. I never even make floors for the other "floors." Why bother if you can't see in anyway? Waste of brick. No wonder my buildings aren't (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pic: New Green Building —John Kelly III
|
| | | | Actually, that's not what I was saying. In this particular instance, one can see into the building. And the ones next to it that are full of activity. If you can't see in, I'd agree that there is no reason to do the detailing unless one wants. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
