| |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
>
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > > First off, the thread is about 8 wide cars,
> > I'm sorry, did I say it wasn't? :-) I doooon't THIINK so... You got away
> > with your advocacy *this time* because it WAS relevant. My warning is to
> > preclude you in future should you be tempted during a *non* relevant thread.
>
> BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8
> wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well.
No, I don't believe I did make that implication. If you drew that inference
where it wasn't implied, I'd say that was sloppy, imprecise, non critical
thinking on your part.
> Sloppy, imprecise language is
> the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D
Well, you're certainly the expert from long practice on sloppy language,
aren't you? Me, I prefer to know it when I see it rather than know it when I
say it.
> Program note: Lar and I are just whorsing around:-)
Indeed. Hence my repeated setting of FUT .fun...
BTW, this being a family forum, I am glad you didn't inadvertantly omit the
"s"... While I won't deny that I may have done that in the past it wasn't
what's going on here.
Although I must say, the way you pander all good taste and sensibility in
your quest for 8 wide converts does make one wonder just how far you'd go in
order to secure a new "wider is better" convert.
Me, I think "longer is better" but, as they say, different strokes for
different folks.
Hope that helps.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8 wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well. Sloppy, imprecise language is the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D Program note: Lar and I are just (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
