To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 8271
8270  |  8272
Subject: 
Re: James Mathis really has caught the 8-wide bug!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 22:48:22 GMT
Viewed: 
1353 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Bram Lambrecht writes:
Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.trains, Bram Lambrecht writes:
Yet another 8 wide from James Mathis:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=1995

Nice job!  Although I don't see any new innovative techniques,

?? Well, maybe not NEW, but there is a LOT of SNOT in this model.

Well, we've come to expect that from every single one of James' creations,
haven't we?  And often, he *does* discover some new method for attaching
stuff.
--Bram

I'm not for sure if this is a new way of attaching "stuff" or not:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2007
One of the models at this site is a box car based on Gianluca's design.  I
think I've approached the stud-offset in a little different manner, but
achieving the same offset fraction. ??
All credit to Gianluca for showcasing this type of "ribbed-pannel"
construction.  (I think.  I hope I haven't misdirected credit.)

I really like the 8-wide creations that others' have built.  This must be
evident in my 8-wide freight copies.  I hope I am not offending anyone by
building similar rolling stock.  I mean it as a show of admiration.
Imitation...flattery....

If a garden railway:
As I set up my 8-wides for photography, I realized that if I had a "garden
railway", I would most definitely want 8-wide format.  As I walked about the
"scene" that I was setting up, I thought the size of 8-wide looked very
attractive at what seems to be a "greater outdoor viewing distance".
Of course, LEGOLAND theme parks use an even larger format for their "garden
railway".

Back inside...and back to 6-wide? ;-)  Before I "lose" too many pieces to
8-wide!

later,
James Mathis



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: James Mathis really has caught the 8-wide bug!
 
(...) Actually, I believe this is a 3/10 stud offset rather than 1/2 stud. Here's how I come up with that number: Based on the the pictuer at: (URL) generally caluclate things base a unit that is 1/5 of a stud width (which is 1/6 the height of a (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.trains)
  Garden Rails (was:Re: James Mathis really has caught the 8-wide bug!)
 
James Mathis wrote: Ha, interesting you mention garden railway, James. I plan on running a garden railway one day, only using my 14 wides running on G scale track. Right now I only have three 14 wides completed, with 4 more in various stages of (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  RE: James Mathis really has caught the 8-wide bug!
 
(...) Well, we've come to expect that from every single one of James' creations, haven't we? And often, he *does* discover some new method for attaching stuff. --Bram Bram Lambrecht BXL34@po.cwru.edu (URL) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.trains)

18 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR