 | | Re: Train Control
|
|
> (...) Correct. I haven't time to even think about it lately. I got it kinda working but I wasn't too happy with the performance. The Digitrax decoder behaved rather erratically, another decoder behaved better. Since then I haven't had time to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
Well, I just burnt up my last remaining motor a month or so ago, so I can't really test the DCC equipment. I've done some searching in NMRA site and have found some good sources to custom build boosters, decoders, and command stations. As for (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
the way I see it, is that you need the PC or the DCC throttle for addressing of the decoders in the engines. They also allow you to choose the address which controls the engine itself. I don't think the shell controller could be capable of doing (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
(...) What about using some off the shelf controller instead of integrating with a computer? What are the trade offs? -Steve (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
I used to be into "real" model railroading when I was young, and have been wondering when someone would get DCC to work with Lego. The day someone accomplishes this is probably the day I get into Lego trains. :) -- Paul Davidson Matthew Bates (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
You heard it here: Paul Davidson will join the train group as a full fledged trainiac when DCC is perfected with LEGO trains! How many more people will DCC bring into the fold? Only one way to tell... Paul, we will be seeing you here with increasing (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
(...) The biggest problem is the ease of destroying your Lego motor by supplying too much current because the voltage will be too high. The train motor does appear to have some type of thermal overload protection in it but I couldn't see an easy way (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
(...) Matt, how about setting the max. voltage of the decoder to 9V? I know some of the digitrax decoders (and the Lenz/Marklin) ones you can do this. James P (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
Mike Poindexter <lego@poindexter.cc> wrote in message news:FopEn1.Kp7@lugnet.com... (...) tell... (...) Heheh.. I already read the group (I'm interested in trains obviously, I just haven't got any yet). Half the reason I *would* get into lego (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
I just had a random thought as to how TLC could give us some capability to run multiple trains without having to go the whole DCC route. Give us a new train motor which has an IR pickup, and a switch to set it to respond to the A, B, or C motor (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:Foq00p.qz@lugnet.com... (...) new (...) the (...) lighting (...) Wouldn't line-of-sight be a problem for trains? I don't know much about Mindstorms infrared sensors specifically, but besides (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
(...) Theoretically you need it only to change a setting... so just make sure that all your potential crashes happen in front of you! :-) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
you'd need to deal with the (...) etc. Only if you want the train to stop in the tunnel. IR (can) have good propagation, my IR remote for my stereo works fine bounced off the wall, but it has to be pointed in somewhat the right direction (1 bounce (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, James Powell (<Foqo64.7Ax@lugnet.com>) wrote at 13:30:04 (...) Or you could use magic, and do it with mirrors :-) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
(...) There was a thread here a while ago about modifying a motor to supply power to the aux connector that powers an RCX. The RCX powers the Motor. I've done just that. Here are some quick pics: (URL) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Control
|
|
Bingo!! I just realized this earlier today and need to test that, but my Lego motor is burned up and need a replacement...... James Powell wrote in message ... (...) too (...) of (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Challenge (was Re: Train Control)
|
|
Tony Priestman <Tony@you-rang.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:n++WUhAZKci4EwO...n.co.uk... (...) but it (...) the (...) Or if you wanted to remain Lego pure, use a stack of silver 2x4 bricks... Mike Poindexter (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
