| |
In lugnet.faq, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> "Z" <leahy@concentric.net> writes:
> > In lugnet.faq, Ron Atkinson writes:
> > > Is there any reason to keep Lego box?
> >
> > I don't think there's a reason to. The boxes are useless. The LEGO
> > parts are what are useful. I don't know why so many people keep useless
> > LEGO boxes; they're good for keeping the parts in place at the store,
> > but once buy it, the box has served its purpose, and is useless, right?
>
> If the box has reasonably strong walls (eg, a big set like 8880 or 6982)
> I often cut off the flip-top and use the box for sorting/storage. The
> smaller trays from medium size boxes are also good for storage.
> --Bram
>
>
> Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
> -------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
> WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
I can see why someone would use a large one for storage. What I think is odd
is that people sometimes collect the boxes. LEGO boxes just don't seem like
the right material for a collection [especially if you never use the pieces
[LEGO stuff is for building, not for dust collecting]] Those strong ones are
useful, I agree.
Z
Z
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
