 | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Steven Barile
|
| | | Metal rails and metal wheels is a good solution. :) Those burned out motors turn out to be a great way to pickup power from rails (when properly modified) that can be rerouted to the battery box charging port. BTW there is some talk about the Pf (...) (16 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Benn Coifman
|
| | | | | (...) Here are my 2c on the entire thread thus far, I'm still concerned that the 4 wide battery is too wide to conceal in the hood of a 6 wide mode of a typical American road switcher (i.e., just about every American locomotive built since 1968). I (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | | --snip-- (...) --snip-- I would hope the box would be black too but I suspect the first PFS trainset will determine its colour (or colours if we're really lucky). Remember, though, that a lot can be concealed in the cab of a train leaving no more (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Tim David
|
| | | | | | | (...) You need to get some proper locos, with two cabs and some nice smooth bodywork between ;-) Tim (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Brian Davis
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I may be missing something, but why not? PF connectors will stack, so you could connect a bunch of PF battery boxes in parallel, and stack a bunch of PF motors off each output (again, in parallel). While this should be possible, I'm not (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Brian Davis
|
| | | | | (...) That sounds interesting, although thinking about it from the standpoint of robotics & robotic trains even more ideas are presenting themselves to me. I'm not sure how this would work with trains... if a discharging train hits a power section (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Tim David
|
| | | | | | (...) From a train point of view, not an issue, simply have a loop (in the UK railway sense of the term. i.e. a double ended siding) and have another train bypass the charging train. tim (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Brian Davis
|
| | | | | | (...) Sure - but then it's not automated. You have to get the first train onto the siding, or (if it was running around the track through the siding in the first place) you have to throw the switch so any other train bypasses the siding on the main (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Dave Sterling
|
| | | | | | (...) I just want to say that there are some REALLY innovative ideas being thrown around here. All this talk of automated recharging on sidings and automated points is just making me giddy. Keep the ideas coming!!! -Dave (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Matija Puzar
|
| | | | | (...) Please do that, it seems like a VERY interesting idea! When I read it it was one of those "but of course, I should have thought of that myself!"-moments :) It should, though, be possible to have the possibility to manually control the train's (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —Mathew Clayson
|
| | | | | (...) I'm intrigued by this. I did a similar experiment using a 8.4v NiCad Battery and a monorail train. Whenever the train was stopped at the station, some metal brushes would contact between the the battery and track side connections. Thus (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains —John Gerlach
|
| | | | (...) Dear LEGO: Please don't screw up this new train system like you screwed up the color change. We need something that can run multiple trains (GMLTC has 7 operating loops on our layout.), something that can pull long / heavy trains, something (...) (16 years ago, 29-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
