Subject:
|
Re: End of 9V Trains protest layout idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:18:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5843 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Martin Srb wrote:
| |
A loco (built after set 112-2) pulled 20 two-axle “oldschool” cars.
|
Does the fixed two-axle type freight car offer more resistance around curves
compared to modern swiveling trucks like I imagine it would? Or would it depend
on the length of the car itself compared to the curve radius?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: End of 9V Trains protest layout idea
|
| (...) Good question - depending on my former tests, I would guess, that short 4-wheel waggons (like the lightweight barrel waggon from set 2126) with not more than 6 studs distance from wheel block to wheel block offer the lower running resistance. (...) (17 years ago, 24-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: End of 9V Trains protest layout idea
|
| (...) In May, I made a test (based on your information): (URL) loco (built after set 112-2) pulled 20 two-axle "oldschool" cars. 11 of them had the old wheels with traction teeth, 6 had various spoked wheels (years 1969-1990) and 3 had the (...) (17 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
