To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 20448 (-20)
  Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
(...) Hi John, what is the advantage of Ross' design against a design like this (without cutting parts)? (URL) Is the friction reduced? Or is there no special thought behind it? For most of my own designs of trucks I have ended up with a design like (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Modifying bricks, Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
(Crosspost to technic, because my reply is more technic releated) (...) Back in the eighties I had a neigbour who was short of technic pistons (nr 3652 on peeron) and created several out of 2x2 bricks. He removed some abs from all sides to make the (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, FTX)
 
  Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
Warning - I like to modify bricks. I understand the - now you've modified it, there's no way back - syndrome. So please allow me to make a suggestion. I try to "make" the parts I need out of parts that are so common that the act of modification (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC: Indian Railways Alco WDM2 with typical coach and a Indian station.
 
(...) A search on bricklink will reveal the price of dark-red, and more importantly the dearth of parts available in that colour. Good luck with it anyway ... you'll be needing a lot of plates!! SteveH (BeLUG) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: MOC: Indian Railways Alco WDM2 with typical coach and a Indian station.
 
(...) Studs Now On Bottom is just a (sarcastic?) variant that I've seen posted before! SteveH (BeLUG) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
(...) Actually, it was Ross' idea to use just one, but here is why I wouldn't use 2. Cutting the wheel out to me was no big deal. I would never use the element as it was. Now, cutting the brick is another story. Now you have committed its use for (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC: Indian Railways Alco WDM2 with typical coach and a Indian station.
 
(...) Don't you mean (URL) SNOT> (Studs Not On Top)? I've never heard of SNOB building before. (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC: Indian Railways Alco WDM2 with typical coach and a Indian station.
 
(...) Wow. Stunning work. The "crowds swarming on" scene is a favorite. I am going to have to try SNOB out, it seems a great idea for stretching limited colors farther. Toastercat seems to be a little, er "tanner"... than usual... Spotlighted! (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: MOC: Indian Railways Alco WDM2 with typical coach and a Indian station.
 
I wanna know how much that Dark red cost cause i was thinking of building a GP38-2 (8wide) with dark red & light yellow... Josh (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
(...) John, I just thought of something. Since you are taking apart 2x2 wheels, why not use two of them. If you snip off one of the loops that holds the axel on, then the two 2x2 axel bricks will sit flush to each other, and you have a 2x4 axel (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  MOC: Indian Railways Alco WDM2 with typical coach and a Indian station.
 
Another type of internationalisation! An Alco WDM2 of the Indian Railways is shown in a typical dark-red livery with yellow highlights. It is shown with an old-style coach, also in dark-red. This is a studs-down design (sometimes referred to as (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains) ! 
 
  Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
(...) Thanks for these - I'll check it out. SteveH (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
 
As promised, I posted pics of the revised version of my son Ross' Bettendorf truck design. They start (URL) HERE> (URL) JOHN (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: Pics: TTX Husky Stack
 
(...) LMAO, good one! Josh (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Pics: TTX Husky Stack
 
(...) The funniest thing about that picture of you (at work) is that your colleague is playing solitaire in the background! ROTFL SteveB (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Pics: TTX Husky Stack
 
Well, I'm not OC, but I have this vice about mutilating. Actually I have a vice, and a drill, and a dremel tool, and... MWAHAHAHAHAHA -Rob (URL) Barile" <steve.e.barile@intel.com> wrote in message news:HGsH9y.1o37@lugnet.com... (...) ILTCO? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Pics: TTX Husky Stack
 
(...) The bevel made him do it! JOHN (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Pics: TTX Husky Stack
 
(...) or two... (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: 3 new virtual train MOCs: Turboliner, le Shuttle, Psi-concept
 
(...) ["cockpit" SNOT technique?] (...) And if not in SNOT, possibly some black stickers would mock it up? (...) haha, :-)) It's always the same with any Lego® car: I can put my elbow on top of most standard limosins - Lego®-figs can't even look (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Pics: TTX Husky Stack
 
(...) lol! (...) I had taken some step by step photos, but pulled them because we made a slight variation that pulled the coupler in closer. I'll retake some and post them in Ross' folder. (...) lol We'll see about that! JOHN (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR