Subject:
|
Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Jun 2003 03:42:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1680 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi wrote:
| |
I just thought of something. Since you are taking apart 2x2 wheels,
why not use two of them. If you snip off one of the loops that holds the
axel on, then the two 2x2 axel bricks will sit flush to each other, and
you have a 2x4 axel brick.
|
Actually, it was Ross’ idea to use just one, but here is why I wouldn’t use 2.
Cutting the wheel out to me was no big deal. I would never use the element as
it was. Now, cutting the brick is another story. Now you have committed its
use for life-- there is no turning back. I know that that sounds contradictory,
but somehow Ross’ way seems less like mutilation to me than yours. Besides,
your way would require twice as many bricks to cut;-)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
|
| Warning - I like to modify bricks. I understand the - now you've modified it, there's no way back - syndrome. So please allow me to make a suggestion. I try to "make" the parts I need out of parts that are so common that the act of modification (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Revised Bettendorf Truck Design
|
| (...) John, I just thought of something. Since you are taking apart 2x2 wheels, why not use two of them. If you snip off one of the loops that holds the axel on, then the two 2x2 axel bricks will sit flush to each other, and you have a 2x4 axel (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
