 | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —James Mathis
|
| | | (...) Yeah, powering the train was a primary design target. I went with 9v track as most readily available power source for me. However, I haven't solved the clearance issue of the 9v track power connectors sticking out and interfering with the car (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I wonder if putting the power connectors on switches (turnouts) on the curved outer leg of an unused spur would help at all? Arrange your trackage so that it's the straight leg (where there is no turnout stand to interfere) that is used by the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —James Mathis
|
| | | | | | | (...) I like it. Good idea. Thanks. (...) Ah, I don't think I've seen this. Thanks. Off to look... Woah! That's impressive: (URL) Mathis (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Steve Barile
|
| | | | | | | I've seen the Wuppertahnbahn diorama too, it's great! What's the URL again? BTW Have you considered using just the power rails from the 12v system for the upper track. This way you get the power, the single rail look, yet the double rail geometry (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This would be an interesting challenge to work with. You would need to use the 70s era power pickups, and then attach wires to them to power a motor. Narrow tires can be run in the gap between the two rails giving very positive guidance. Frank (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) You would only be able to go through the points one direction since they need to be switched to the diverging track in order for the power to be transmitted from the diverging track to the straight track. Frank (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yep. (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) If you arranged it as a passing loop, with power to the passing track, you could have one of the switches straight depending on which way it was going. Possibly even work out an automatic control that switched them depending on the direction (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) And I just thought, doesn't power still get through to the straight track as the loco passes a "reversed" switch in the wrong direction and pushes the switching rail out of the way? I had an idea the switching of power was done with trickery (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Ludo Soete
|
| | | | | (...) A possible solution could be soldering a wire on the metal track rail. If you turn a rail upside down, you'll see small gaps with bended metal lips. You can solder there a wire. Let the wire come out on the bottom side of the rail and bend it (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Under Hanging Train Idea: v1 Concept design —Ludo Soete
|
| | | | (...) It say's : Ein elektrischer Antrieb ist nicht vorhanden, witch means that there's no electrical drive, so no motor at all. anyhow, it's nice done. Regards, Ludo Soete (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
