Subject:
|
Re: Super Chief Weight Issues
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 23:01:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
459 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> A few random observations. Manfried is right, 3 motors will often give worse
> performance than 2. And 4 can be correspondingly even worse, because of the
> current supply limits of the speed regulator.
Indeed. My N class with 2 motorised bogies & the engine motor inside runs no
better (grade-wise) than with 1 motorised bogie, and actually causes a single
controller to cut out (I assume a heat switch) after an hour or 2 constant
running.
Also I've found putting a weight brick in the fuel tank (low CoG) increases
cornering stability as well as traction.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Super Chief Weight Issues
|
| (...) Really??? I had never heard of a controller cutting out (it does have a heat triggered overload sensor) with just one or two motors loading it REGARDLESS of length of continuous running. Wow. I wonder why. What is your frequency in Oz? 50hz or (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Super Chief Weight Issues
|
| (...) I would agree there. You get BENEFIT from having the motor on a heavy vehicle because it reduces slippage. A few random observations. Manfried is right, 3 motors will often give worse performance than 2. And 4 can be correspondingly even (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
